this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
118 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5919 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Goddamn NPR, look how far out you had to go to avoid saying he's a liar, he's demented, he's anything.

You see that don't you? Look: "Trump’s own version of reality" what is that? What? "version of reality"? By itself that doesn't make any sense. Contextually we all get it, but why can't you say something more concrete? Why leave it all cloudy and non-specific? (Don't tell me fear of being sued - that's a red herring. You're telling me the billion-dollar media organizations (and NPR) can't fathom how they might swing a first amendment case against a convicted felon and pathological liar? Bullshit.)

And "continues to confound" damn - confound does it. Like, what, they can't understand his genius? You see how you're leaving the out there? Don't do that. Stop it. Be a proper journalistic entity. Call it like it is. Don't be afraid.

[–] Questy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a good article that deeply examines Trump's use of grandiose and unsupported claims, made up "facts", and the difficulty in framing and reacting to it experienced by media and politicians. I don't think dumbing down the wording to "Trump lies" will do anything to improve it. The entire premise and text of the article takes it as given that Trump lies so frequently and thoroughly that it transcends being a liar and becomes an alternative reality his followers have bought into. If you're worried they're not calling him out, you should read it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

I don't think dumbing down the wording to "Trump lies" will do anything to improve it.

Respectfully, I disagree entirely. The whole point is the headline. Because trump's supporters don't read articles. The headline is the closest we're going to get. The fact that every corporate news organization (yes that includes NPR) goes to incredible lengths to NOT say he lied is proof enough they're doing it deliberately. See "falsely claimed".

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe it's just a different viewpoint, but I find the sarcasm of that headline vastly more damning than just saying 'Trump lies again'. It basically saying that his brain is so fried that he's unable or unwilling to engage with the reality the rest of us experience.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Of course, but that’s because you’re already engaged with both politics and the written word. Qanon Qaren needs to see the words Trump Lies in black-and-white a lot, so the message begins to sink in.

The more the headlines don’t say it the harder it is to win, and the longer this whole trump horror continues.

And they know that