this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
420 points (76.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26920 readers
2776 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I love chicken, pork, and beef. I have tried the meat alternatives and I like most of what I have tried. I would be vegetarian if it honestly wasn't so expensive sometimes. Not to say meat isn't also expensive.

I work with a guy who is a vegan and honestly. I don't get the hate towards the life style. Guy is as healthy as they get and morally more sound in the area of food than I am.

What am I missing on Vegan hate or even vegetarian hate. No one imposes on me. Honestly, I feel like they have something figured out I dont.

[–] jjagaimo@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

There is a small vocal minority that essentially equates anyone who keeps eating meat regardless of circumstances, preference or nuance, [to killers, murderers, etc]. Honestly a large amount of people would take a vegan option if it tasted the same, had the same texture, was as cheap or cheaper than meat, was as accessible, and didn't require learning a new skill set. There's also the availability when eating out.

Antagonizing people like that is a good way to have them disagree out of spite, and the militant vegans always have a way of inserting themselves into every conversation. I had to block people on lemmy because I just didnt want to deal with that here.

Unfortunately a vegan who is a good person isn't alwayd out there proselytizing at every chance they get in a non intrusive manner, so people rarely if ever see vegans who are reasonable people relative to vegan extremists.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Keyword is small. It’s important not to extrapolate against a populace based on the actions of their extremist or reactionary members.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's difficult when the small minority is much louder than the majority.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But isn’t that what racist say to explain away their racism?

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Honestly a large amount of people would take a vegan option if it tasted the same, had the same texture, was as cheap or cheaper than meat, was as accessible, and didn't require learning a new skill set.

And businesses would stop burning fossil fuels if renewables had the same portability, same output, were cheaper, available everywhere, and didn't require learning a new skill set. They can still be criticised for doing so, I'm not sure what your point here is?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately a vegan who is a good person isn't alwayd out there proselytizing at every chance they get in a non intrusive manner,

That's the thing imo, if a vegan is alwayd out there proselytizing at every chance they get then they are by default not a good person even if they do it in a supposed non intrusive manner and are by default vegan extremists imo. Proselytizing is in and of itself intrusive by definition imo, like ads.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think that's what they said. Also is your ` key broken

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago
[–] regnn@infosec.pub 22 points 2 months ago

Mostly bandwagon hate because of a vocal minority. TBH I find it amusing the people who really ride it act just like they are complaining about.

Also strict diets require more nutritional knowledge that some seem to be lacking.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The vegan hate likely comes from people who dont really know vegans or only know them from the internet so they only know the vocal minority

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I know several vegans and they're all cool. The terminally online militant ones suck.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Oh, I've met some annoying ones in real life.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

They are a small, harmless minority. Isn't that enough? Maybe it's made worse by the fact that they are perceived as non-violent and effeminate, because of their strong opposition to suffering, even when the victims are helpless, like animals. There is no personal risk in bullying them. It's like the hate for environmental activists, trans-women, or liberals in general. I wouldn't know that vegans aggressively proselytize their life-style if people didn't aggressively tell me so; something that they share with "the gays". Of course, people wouldn't mind if they didn't shove it in their faces all the time. Where have I heard that before?

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The vocal minority of gays don't call me a murderer for liking women.

[–] blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but maybe they would, if you instead of liking ate their body parts and would pay an industry to kill them for that purpose? We can only speculate.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, I'm quite aware vegans have a reason to be upset. Unfortunately, equating eating meat or drinking milk to personally murderering and torturing animals is not going to earn them any fans, and will in fact push people away from their just cause out of spite.

That's not at all relevant to the comment I was responding to, though.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Believing that animals are just like us s hardly and outlandish belief, on the facts. We're evolutionarily closely related. We have basically the same skeleton. Skull, spine, rib cage, hips, 4 extremities. Arms and legs go: 1 big bone, 2 smaller bones, and lotsa little bones. It looks to be the same with the brain.

We expect vegans not to blow up slaughterhouses or such. Fair enough. But expecting them to shut up about their beliefs is a bit much, no? Expecting them not to tell people how they feel, not to kiss in public, or hold a pride para... Sorry, wrong prosecuted minority.

I've heard these takes about vegans for literal decades now, and not once has an actual vegan popped up to tell me that I'm a murderer.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Okay? The ONLY thing I mentioned was them calling people murderers. Glad you haven't, but I have had that happen. Another thing I've seen that I have issue with is vegans pushing their diets on their carnivorous pets. Like cats. But I have literally no problem with 99% of vegans expressing their beliefs.

Yes, I’m quite aware vegans have a reason to be upset.

their just cause

Like I said. I even think they're usually in the right. While I'm not a vegan for my own personal reasons, I hope they eventually make a positive change in the world.

[–] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, you are paying someone else to do those things for you. Or if you want to quibble over verbs, paying someone else to cause harm to animals for you.

If it’s not currently possible for you to eat a less harmful diet, that's one thing. There's a ton of ways that our lifestyles can cause harm, and it's perfectly fine if you're just not in a good place to change one particular aspect of it. Refusing to acknowledge the harm that you are causing is frankly much more concerning. From understanding comes action, after all.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, you are paying someone else to do those things for you.

That's not exactly what's going on. I believe a more apt way to describe it would be paying somebody that has harmed animals. This may sound like a distinction without a difference, but I don't believe it is. Whether I buy pork at a grocery store or not, they aren't going to kill any fewer pigs because of it. It's not like the slaughterhouse is going to butcher exactly one less pig because I stopped buying meat. If I decide not to buy pork chop the next time I go to a store, either somebody else buys the pork, it's donated to a food bank right before expiry, or it's just thrown away. The pig is already dead, and the meat goes somewhere regardless.

Unless you're the type of person that eats meat every day, there is very little change you can make at an individual level. Of course, much like voting, change starts to happen once you get a lot of people to make that individual choice. Get 20 people to stop buying pork, and the store might order less. But at that point, I would argue it is far more of a societal issue. So while we are directly responsible for what happens to farm animals, I don't think it's at the level of us literally killing them ourselves.

[–] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

Pardon me for fighting you on this, but I believe you are incorrect. You're abdicating your responsibility, in assuming that those animals will always be killed.

Put it this way. If you lived next to a chicken farm, and drove over there any time you needed a chicken, and watched them kill it for you, would you have any qualms about saying it was killed for you? Why does having it go through a grocery store first somehow change this? However you get your meat, those animals were still killed for your benefit.

The average American eats about 250 pounds of meat in a year. That's a bit over half a cow, or about one and a half pigs, or somewhere north of a hundred chickens. That's the butcher's bill, directly attributable to the average American. So to take your own words - yes, if you stop eating meat, exactly one pig will not be killed every year. Around one and half, actually.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well, it's what they believe. What exactly is the problem there? I have never been called a murderer. There just aren't that many vegans around. I don't know in what kind of circles this would be a common occurrence.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well, it’s what they believe

I'm sorry but this is a dogshit justification in nearly every situation

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At first, I was confused. Isn't the fact that you believe something the only justification for saying something? I mean, otherwise you'd be lying. But you're saying you disagree with the belief in the first place, right?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying that the idea that something is justified because it is believed makes no sense. Apologies for being unclear.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok, I understand. You don't like them because of their beliefs.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No, I'm making the same point as @redisdead. Everyone says things because they believe them. That doesn't make what they say correct/valid/etc just because of that belief. I actually think that veganism is a morally good position, but the justification of that position being "because I believe it" means literally nothing.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so that's why you're not making any sense. You have no idea what's going on.

Look, it's very simple. Vegans are a small, harmless minority. So some people bully them. Of course, it's their own fault. They wouldn't mind them if they weren't "out and proud". It's always the same story. There's almost no variation.

I thought you were saying that it's ok to bully them because they believe the wrong thing. That's what @redisdead is saying. He compares them to "right wing cunts" when they speak their beliefs. Fascis get bashis. Just like vegans, I guess.

Watch the company you keep.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I believe he was making a comparison to show how dumb "because they believe it" is as a justification.

You have no idea what’s going on.

Ironic coming from the guy who doesn't understand an extremely simple concept that two people have patiently tried to explain over the course of five comments. Of course instead of just listening to what we have to say, you insist on accusing me of things that have no basis in reality. Your insistence to categorize people has led you to mischaracterize me, and I doubt I'm the first one. I'm going to assume you frequently have these sorts of arguments, so please step back and take this opportunity to analyze why they keep ending up this way. I will not respond further, I've spent too much time on this already; if you're still confused, reread the thread. Goodbye.

[–] redisdead@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yet when a right wing cunt says what he believes about minorities, that's a problem.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Vegans believe that animals have the same rights to live as humans. A nazi believes that the "others" do not have the same right to live as "his people".

I don't think you'll be able to convince me that these are morally or ethically equivalent positions. But I see the point. They both believe the wrong thing. The out-group sucks. Yes, I know how humans tick.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So what you're saying is, their belief in their position doesn't make it right/wrong. It's the position itself that makes it right/wrong. That's what we've been trying to say.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago

Animals massively outnumber us. It's not our fault they are cowards and can't organize a rebellion properly.