this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
78 points (78.7% liked)

movies

1735 readers
1134 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amerika@annihilation.social -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@ProdigalFrog @Blaze

There's a reason James Bond used a .25 and .30 with a suppressor.

[–] ProdigalFrog 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Those are pretty terrible options to surpress, since once they are made subsonic to avoid the supersonic crack, they have little energy to actually inflict wounds due to how light the bullets are (still deadly, just very underpowered). He would've been better off with a 9mm or a 45, but both would've been a little harder to conceal.

A British gun nut wrote to Fleming about how terrible the .25acp is ballistically, which is why Fleming later made bond use a Walther PPK in a .32acp. The gun nut also inspired him to create Q.

[–] amerika@annihilation.social 1 points 2 months ago

@ProdigalFrog

Personally, I like the 1911, but for subtlety situations, not so much.

The little bullets do not pack much power but once they get inside the body, they do a lot of damage.