this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

2223 readers
88 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sonori@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think placing Aviation in the good to uncertain category is rather generous given the energy density requires such a large shift in airliner design in an industry that has only recently stopped requiring an experimental fuel variance to use unleaded fuel in the same model of engines that have been operating on the ground with unleaded for about half a century.

Biofuel and chemical synthesis just offer a simpler and nearly drop in replacement, with the main limitation being it costs more so the airlines are trying to drag their feet as much as their lobbyists allow them to, and somehow I doubt a complete redesign of nearly everything in aviation is going to be less expensive than switching to biodiesel.

[–] silence7 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The issue with biofuels is that we can't actually produce enough of them to support anything like current levels of aviation, at least not without substantially displacing food production.

The issue with chemical synthesis is that it's quite expensive.

So there's a possibility that we'll end up using hydrogen still.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago

Ohh I don’t think that we could sustain current levels of aviation with biofuels, though without their use as an lead substitute in gasoline and progress in reducing natural meat production we might be able to, just that it’s a lot more likely than getting a very slow to change industry to rebuild every single airport, aircraft, and fuel transport with a more expensive and less capable alternative.

Most of the limitation on chemical synthesis is from my understanding that it definitionally requires more energy than it produces, and as such doesn’t make much sense when that primary energy comes from fossil fuels which you could then have used instead. I also suspect that the cost while very high will be a lot lower than the amount required to basically rebuild the entirety of aviation from scratch.

[–] gandalf_der_12te 1 points 2 months ago

It's a conundrum, because while biofuels are expensive, there are ways to make them significantly cheaper, for example refining organic garbage and waste into fuels.