this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
420 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

58108 readers
4090 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
420
No one’s ready for this: Our basic assumptions about photos capturing reality are about to go up in smoke. (www.theverge.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
175 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

People can write things that aren't true! Oh no, now we can't trust trustworthy texts such as scientific papers that have undergone peer review!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 3 weeks ago

The Verge are well versed on writing things that are untrue

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

I mean.... have you seen the scathing reports on scientific papers, psychology especially? Peer review doesn't catch liars. It catches bad experimental design, and it sometimes screens out people the reviewers don't like. Replication can catch liars sometimes, but even in the sciences that are 'hard' it is rare to see replication because that doesn't bring the grant money in.