Feminism

289 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to the feminism community on Lemmy.World!

Rules:

This is a feminist community, meant for discussing issues around equality and gender. Disagreement is acceptable but anti-feminist statements are not. Similarly, TERF-aligned comments, including anti-trans or other anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments are not allowed. This does not preclude debunking anti-feminist talking points.
Posts must be related to feminism, gender issues, or related content. Topics can include current issues/news, historical topics, personal questions/thoughts, or discussion threads. If you are unsure if your post is on-topic, feel free to message the mods before posting.
Memes and humor are allowed but should not be excessively posted.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Utilizing such language in your username will also result in a ban.
Follow site-wide rules.

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

jeffw@lemmy.world

What is a woman? Australian court rules in landmark case (www.bbc.com)

submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/feminism@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Damn, whoever wrote that seemed upset. I dunno if it was just me but the article seemed disapproving about the ruling. That said, it was written for the BBC, so it wouldn't be surprising if they disapproved.

[–] andrew_s@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago

I got the same vibe from reading the article - I feel like there was a time when the BBC wouldn't have given so much space to the views of a person who actually just lost a court case over them.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Not really surprising from the bbc