this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
797 points (99.1% liked)

News

22890 readers
4184 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The vice president is rolling out her first revenue-raising policy proposal as the Democratic presidential nominee and drawing a contrast with GOP opponent Donald Trump.

Vice President Kamala Harris is calling for raising the corporate tax rate to 28%, her first major proposal to raise revenues and finance expensive plans she wants to pursue as president.

Harris campaign spokesman James Singer told NBC News that she would push for a 28% corporate tax rate, calling it “a fiscally responsible way to put money back in the pockets of working people and ensure billionaires and big corporations pay their fair share.”

If enacted, the policy would raise hundreds of billions of dollars, as the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has projected that 1 percentage point increases in the corporate rate corresponds to about $100 billion over a decade. It would also roll back a big part of former President Donald Trump’s signature legislation in 2017 as president, which slashed the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.

Trump, meanwhile, recently said he would cut taxes even further if elected president, including on businesses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What is this tax on? Is it profits only? Or something else?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Important questions. Fiscal policy is wildly complex and what's that saying about the road to hell and best intentions?

I'm here for that conversation. What does tax hell out of them mean? Sounds good to me, but the idea deserves some talk.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I guess it means you send a lobbyist to Washington and invent ludicrous tax deductions so that your company pays a near zero effective tax rate. Just like Amazon!

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephaniedenning/2019/02/22/why-amazon-pays-no-corporate-taxes/

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's also because they don't make much or any profit, right? That's why I was asking whether they were taxing revenue or profit.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe, but logically they should be taxed on revenue, right? I mean, that’s how we’re taxed as individuals. We don’t get to pay nothing because we took our whole salary and reinvested it into real estate or something. But they do.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We don’t get to pay nothing because we took our whole salary and reinvested it into real estate or something.

You literally described a 401k.

I get your point though. All of our income is considered profit, but if we were taxed like businesses we'd be able to exclude rent and groceries etc.

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Except a 401k gets taxed on withdrawals, potentially at a higher tax rate than you were paying when you invested some or even most of it. Also, we can't invest our whole salary into a 401k, as there's a hard limit on contributions. Whereas a business never gets taxed on the assets they invested in to offset their profits (except maybe state/local property tax, but then they get to deduct that from federal tax...), plus they get to deduct the depreciation of said asset for years going forward.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

You also don't want to put a huge burden on small growing companies though. I think they should transfer from a profit rate to adding on a revenue rate as the company gets bigger and the revenue increases.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Of course it's on profit, same as the existing corporate taxes. She's not proposing a new type of tax, just increasing existing rates.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Then it's mostly useless for the biggest business.