this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
1151 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59080 readers
4093 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1151
ISP to Supreme Court: We shouldn’t have to disconnect users accused of piracy (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 months ago by flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
169 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 147 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why should ISP lose revenue enforcing laws for another corpos benefit?

If media industry was serious, they should pay for it 🫢

[–] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Their game is just to try to make the ISPs liable; they don't actually want it enforced. In fact, failure to enforce is the feature. They paint the ISP as complicit in the piracy then sue the ISP for hundreds of millions in damages hoping for a no-fault settlement. That's a much better revenue stream than suing someone for 10k who can't pay it.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 27 points 2 months ago

There is a lesson in here about decentralization here folks 🫢