Asklemmy

43747 readers

1517 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

How does labour strike against AI is supposed to protect them? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 months ago by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I started seeing more people in the creative industries striking to get a protection against AI.

As a company won't that mean that I should invest more in AI to not suffer through strikes?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Assuming that creatives can be replaced by AI (meaning there isn't some soft cap on how good it can get for technical reasons) then creatives will be replaced with AI. The only difference striking makes is whether it happens in 5-10 years or 10-20.