TBF that is literally the exact motivation behind Cinnamon. Mint was like "yo, GNOME 3 sucks for what were trying to do" and forked. I think that's also why you see such string MATE support with Mint, too. Those developers fucking loved GNOME 2 (with good reason, GNOME 2 was genuinely excellent).

Back in the day I thought GNOME 3 would eventually stabilize into something suitable for daily use, but their constant breaking of APIs frustrates me to no end and makes me view the GNOME project as just being... Out of touch with the reality of the kinds of people who use computers. They're so hyper focused on their usage patterns they don't recognize they've made themselves irrelevant to most of us.

I genuinely mean it when I say KDE and LXDE-Qt (these days just LXDE, but I want to make sure its clear what I'm talking about) are the future. Its not so much because I think their platforms are intrinsically superior, but instead their philosophy to how developing for the desktop works. And for those who think KDE is too heavy and LXDE is too idiosyncratic, running a desktop without any desktop environment has become downright easy as of late. I'm running MX Linux with fluxbox and Antix with IceWM and I rarely miss features of the big DEs and I'm just running what those two ship with.

I loved GNOME 2. It got so much right and really did a lot to get out of your way. GNOME 3 meanwhile has some truly stellar core ideas for how humans computer interactions can be performed but everything surrounding those core ideas (the ecosystem) sucks because GNOME doesn't value stability anymore. That's probably somewhat fine on a rolling release distro, but... I don't... Think the average person looking to GNOME's ease of use are going to trend toward rolling releases and are going to prefer pointal releases. Probably the best place to run GNOME on a pointal releases these days is Fedora since that's where so much GNOME development happens anyway, but Fedora has issues I frankly don't want to deal with because fedora doesn't offer me (emphasized because if fedora is offering you special value, that's fine abd valid) value thanks to being a somewhat unstable pointal release distro (be stable or be rolling release. Ideally be both. Don't be neither)

And all of this is kind of a shame, too. There's a whole ecosystem of GTK apps that are effectively decaying because no one trusts GNOME to provide a stable platform and for people who've come to rely on those apps, there's gonna come a time they're gonna have to migrate to unfamiliar Qt apps. They'll be able to handle it of course, but most people just want their shit to work how they know it works and to not deal with their system being different from how they're used to.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Gnome 3 was a regression of what I still believe is a perfect UX metaphor for computing. Gnome 2 was perfect in every way. I've since gone to Xfce, but it feels like Gnome 3 and beyond is trying to make using Unix fool-proof for a touchscreen paradigm, and you really can't.

You should give people the keys without difficulty, but give them everything they need to not need them. And you're never going to run Gnome on a tablet. There's no point in making everything pronounced, you'll have an input device that's not a finger on a screen. Emulating something else like Windows or macOS doesn't make you seem unique, it makes you seem similar and if the paradigms aren't the same, its confusing. Have some audacity to be different.

It's important to remember Gnome exists because KDE was in a license fiasco of its own making. And we're in a new fiasco with GTK over mismanagement.