I do this to myself and then get disappointed 20min later.
"Nah, surely they wouldn't make it that obvious, that would be downright bad writing... More clues, they must be trying to lead me astray and then surprise me with a better twist! Oh, it really was just the obvious one... Hmm."
That's... actually quite interesting. I wonder how true the part about projecting current emotions on it is. I never see it as anything, but an emotionless face.
This was my old keyboard, until I fell into the rabbit hole of
!ergomechkeyboards@lemmy.world ...
I'm not quite sure if I'm better or worse off now, but I love my Moonlander nonetheless.
I was going to say I haven't had any issues, but then remembered I only sort by New and Top...
I'd also suggest Arch assuming one has patience for some tinkering. Getting familiar with the Arch Wiki and the other resources that exist is quite useful even with other distros! Not to mention the better understanding of the system gained simply by following the installation guide.
Even if one doesn't stick with the distro, the things learned setting it up will be useful down the line as well. The experience would also be very different from Debian based things, so it could be fun for a distro hop!
I think it's worth mentioning the amount of instances full of bots as well. I just started hosting my own instance and decided to check other instances' block lists to defederate from at least some bot instances. I now have about 50 blocked instances. (instances with 60k or so users each with no posts)
I'd say what's intuitive is very subjective. Most of a language tends to be intuitive to its native speakers, no matter how unintuitive it seems to someone else.
To me the intuitive genderless option for "he/she" would be "it". Coming from Finnish, it seems much more natural to have "it" include people instead of using "they" for both singular and plural. Or if using "they", it would feel intuitive to say "they is" instead of "they are".
I'm aware it's a thing and not really a plural. What I was trying to say is that it looks plural and since I didn't learn about this part of English until several years into my studies as a kid, it isn't as well established in my mind as "you are" is (that also looks like a plural, but I'm used to it).
"They are" for a single person catches my mental error filter the same way as "I are" or "you is" would, which is highly annoying.
but it's Monday... and I'm not quite sure what conclusion to draw from that.
I very much agree. Learning English as a foreign language, it feels very wrong to use plural for a single person. I'm still not quite used to it! Although, had I been taught that early on, I doubt it would feel any weirder than using "you are" for a single person.
Pfft, rest of the world should start following Finns on this and call everyone and everything 'it'! Except pets for some reason.
My cats are always sleepy. Except when I'm sleeping, that's the time for a race around the house.