wagoner

How else will they continue to exchange illegal images with each other?

But are they also required to do so?

"Crucially, the order did not provide the contents of the activist’s email, which are encrypted and cannot be accessed by Proton. Yen said a similar order would also not be able to provide ProtonVPN metadata, as VPNs are subject to different requirements under Swiss law."

From the verge article

Doesn't Digital Commons mean common ownership? A personal blog of family photos inherently owned by that photographer are surely not commonly owned. I see this as problematic.

With my EV I follow recommended practice to ensure longevity of the battery. I rarely charge it more than halfway as I don't need to for my regular usage, and I avoid letting it run down entirely. Once you engage in battery swapping, where's the incentive to take care of it well? After my first swap my brand new excellent condition battery is replaced by who knows what.

I'd like to see evidence of what the original poster on this thread says before trusting what they are saying. I haven't seen this be the case at all.

"We purchase and acquire books—yes, physical, paper books—and make them available for one person at a time to check out and read online"

We can all tell you didn't read the article.

This makes no sense. You definitely need to follow up with support to find out what happened.

Unless only 5 of those 500k users participate in your interests...

They excel at pivots

I'm filing this under the new style login pages after inputting your email address:

"Do you want to log in using password, passkey, email confirmation?"

I'd like to believe that to be true