waggz

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Movie(s) with best soundtrack? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

Tombstone and Almost Famous for me

What's a handy terminal command you use often? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
[–] waggz@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

you ever use ctrl+r ?

Stunning Video Shows How Much Earth Has Changed in 1.8 Billion Years in c/science@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Pangaea is only the most recent supercontinent, and therefore the most known. there are believed to be several more iterations in this cycle of combining and breaking up large landmasses.

What is your motto? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

If the grass looks greener on the other side it's probably being well fertilized.

This guy living his best weirdest life in c/political_weirdos@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago

Outside of using someone's likeness for commercial gain, pretty much anywhere that is public property you can't be stopped from photographing anything you can see. Private property can make their own rules but all they can do is trespass you and kick you out, it's still not illegal. Public photography is generally protected under the first amendment free press.

TIL that Svetlana Savitskaya, the second woman in space, arrived at Mir (modular space station) in 1982, where she was greeted with an apron as a welcome present, and jokingly told to get to work in t in c/til@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev -1 points 3 months ago

another female politician that resembles lewis capaldi

An exonerated man was ‘50 feet from freedom.’ Then a court stopped him. in c/news@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

this same AG is suing new York for prosecuting trump alleging ejection interference. he's a real piece of work

In January, is it winter in Australia? in c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

also for Americans, Austria is not Australia

What video games would you rather watch someone else play than play it yourself? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago

Hearthstone. couldn't keep up with new cards and it's more fun to watch other people lose.

Now I have 1 GBit fiber and can't benefit :-( in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I had to upgrade my pfsense hardware when I got fiber several years ago, which was in a similar situation as yours. The CPU just couldn't handle the connection table.

Bidet users, how do you dry your ass afterward? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
[–] waggz@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

personally i still use a few squares of tp and just blot dry and flush it

Tim Burton's Batman is 35: Once Upon a Time, Superhero Movies Could Be Bold Auteur Visions in c/movies@lemm.ee
[–] waggz@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

They're great but I can't stand bale's Batman voice. so annoying

6
Looking for advice on prioritizing traffic in my setup (programming.dev)
 

My current setup is in two rooms. These rooms are connected via a TL-SG108E switch in one room (Room A) and a SG300-10 switch in the other (Room B). I have two WANs, one in each room. The primary WAN (fiber) is in Room A. The pfSense is in Room B. I have two VLANs set up, one for WAN and one for LAN. There are LAN devices in both rooms. The traffic is tagged so that the WAN traffic goes only to the pfSense and any LAN traffic is then separated as well, but using the same connection between the switches. All connections are 1 Gbps except for a few individual devices that don't support it that are irrelevant to this issue.

I have an OpenVPN interface set up in pfSense over WAN B. A device in Room A uses this connection exclusively via pfSense rules that force traffic from that device IP to use the VPN gateway and blocks when the gateway is down. Even though I've limited the bandwidth to 10 Mbps and connections to 1000, and WAN A is 1 Gbps and WAN B is 450 Mbps, whenever the VPN connection is being used it negatively affects my normal WAN A traffic.

I don't know for sure but I'm guessing this is some kind of issue with the connection between the two switches. Are there any settings or configuration changes I can make to alleviate the strain or prioritize my normal LAN traffic to make the VPN secondary? Would another physical setup work better? I was considering potentially moving the pfSense box to Room A, but my primary device is in Room B as well. If there's any more information that might be useful please ask.

view more: next ›