tiredturtle

joined 2 years ago
[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

Blading. Trump could've easily razored his own ear open like wrestlers do.

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago

Sad and yet not surprising as the external influence achieved the shift to the right

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Lurking this thread and chiming in, but I don't know. Is it because of accelerationism? A faster collapse is quite harmful to many

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (12 children)

Yeah it's tough to find a compromise when Russia seems to go for the total victory or at least a settlement of gains and Ukraine hopes for a stalemate without border changes.

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (14 children)

The war is a classic example of fascist infighting

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

I'm sorry this instance has problematic relationships with some capitalist overlords being favoured but you are correct.

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

I'll try to see if I catch examples happening

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sources like The Guardian, Reuters, Telegraph, CNN, BBC are sometimes allowed and sometimes removed on rule 1.

The latter case is usually evident while lurking and finding a deep long comment thread. Sometimes one user there has deleted messages and there's another's rule 3 content comments left. Apparently these cases seem to usually be mutual rule 3 but it looks like they're treated differently.

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

It is somewhat opaque how sometimes the rules apply and sometimes they don't, like news sources on rule 1, and iirc rule 3 in general. Deleting content should have the mod informing the user and the rest community what happened and have a way for the users to manage mistakes, be it either accidental rule breaks by the user or wrongful modding.

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The headline is a bit misleading. The article elaborates some, for example:

In other remarks, Crosetto said that if Russian troops were to occupy Kyiv, it would "inevitably lead to a clash with other nations, which would not accept Russian tanks on their borders."

European nations have been voicing the need of peace from the beginning, it's just that the negotiating third parties can't get Russia to participate in a dialogue. Which leads to desperate stuff like France asking for China to do their part (desperate because they'd need some unlikely deal incentive to flip).

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

They kinda pretend to play both sides, kinda not. Left hand says peace talks (without action and on Russia's terms), right hand helps Russia with resources.

view more: ‹ prev next ›