the_stormcrow

joined 1 year ago
[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It's hopeless my dude. Lemmy is filled with either wannabe revolutionaries or establishment toadies. There's no healthy scepticism to be found yet.

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

What does "quietly" even mean? Didn't take out ads in Times Square?

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Multiple things can be bad at the same time. It is also possible to fight without being barbaric.

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Got it. So it's banned if elected, accountable officials decline to use taxpayer funds to purchase a book that might not be age appropriate.

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By banned do you mean unable to be purchased by a private citizen by any legal means?

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

By far the best part of the service

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now apply this same reasoning to other life concepts we've been told, and welcome to enlightenment.

(Or black pilling, YMMV)

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Which makes no sense. How are the words picked? Is there a sliding scale, or an objectionable meter somewhere? Who decided that b!tch should be censored, but not cunt or skank?

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

This is only a good argument if the conduct regulated by the law is bad in and of itself.

view more: next ›