the_frumious_bandersnatch

joined 1 year ago

Yep. I said it then and it's only become more true that Jan 6th was Trump's Beer Hall Putsch and we're set to repeat history.

Thanks for providing the link

[–] the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How many of them changed their minds when they were told that DJT is, in fact, over the age of 75?

What do you think Biden will be able to on court reform without a supermajority in the House and Senate?

The court reform announcement is entirely an aspirational effort. "Just think what we could do if you get out and vote."

I think that, like it or not, the legal landscape today is what we have to contend with this election cycle.

[–] the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This would be awesome. Give Harris a two hour uninterrupted prime time spot to let the former prosecutor make a case against electing a convicted felon and follow it with 2 hours of the oldest candidate in US history rambling. 😆

The show follows the book series faithfully through the first six books. The loose ends tie into the story arch of the last three books. But I think they ended the show at a really good place because the last arch takes a turn toward the "fantastic" which is still good but feels very different from the rest.

[–] the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, the whole first season can be a bit of a slog. It doesn't really pick up until the storylines converge which is like episode 8.

But, it absolutely pays off with the rest of the series.

Play up her former DA status. This year the election is between Law and Lawlessness.

Harris: "I would be happy to prosecute the case against the felon in the next debate, let's just see if he shows up for his court date or if he's too busy taking bribes from his rich tech bro friends."

Yep, the Democratic problem is not persuading cultists on the other side, it's energizing the base.

 

Donald Trump's lawyers are seeking to vacate his New York hush money conviction based on Monday's Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.

 

I guess you could say I swapped Bob a loo mop and got Pam's broom.

 

In a 6-3 decision, SCOTUS rejected the notion that state legislatures have unlimited power to determine the rules for federal elections and draw partisan congressional maps without interference from state courts.

How much effect will this have on existing congressional maps and upcoming elections?

view more: next ›