As I briefly explained above, I don't see a point to this hypothetical question and I was not convinced by your arguments, so I will not engage to answering it.
It looks like we see things quite differently. For me all Genocides are evil. I believe it is important to study their differences so they do not reoccur in any way, shape or form. Obviously as humans we haven't worked on this properly (for many of reasons) and one more is currently happening to Palestinians. In that sense comparing randomly any two of them as to see which one is worst, it honestly doesn't make sense to me.
Do you regard the Soviets and the Nazis as equally evil?
I'm not too sure how constructive this question is. They have different characteristics for sure and this is enough for me, in terms of analysis.
Lovely article, great you thought of sharing it. Herbalism is a quite recent thing for me tbh. It's like a hole new world to me, even tho I know it's a super old one.
Great article, I didn't know about this effort. I have to admit, at first it did not make any sense to me, since it took me almost half the article before remembering that gas in the US, is what is called petrol in other english speaking places, and is definitely not related to natural gas.
I think what the article is trying to say is that
Monuments such as Menga make us think that “perhaps we miscalculate the amount of intelligence that [Neolithic people] had,” (...)
as well as
“They are lessons not to think that we are the greatest civilization ever.”
I suppose this depends on where one lives. For the US, I think psilocybin assisted therapy is available in Oregon, Colorado and a in couple of places in California. In Australia it is already legal since 2023.
Apart from that there are several countries in the world where psilocybin can be bought legally. I don't know for sure, but I would assume one could find there some physicians exercising this sort of therapy.
From the link you provided, it looks like in 2021 it was 4.2 not 7.5. Apart from that, this approach sounds too speculative to me, since the production comes from 2021 and the CO~2~ emissions quota from 2023. In the Drax chart it shows a decline in TWh produced from 2017 to 2021 (btw 2021 is also the year they retired coal). Still, assuming from this trend that their production few years latter continues to decline is something I would consider too risky to do.
- 2017 -> 14.9
- 2018 -> 11.7
- 2019 -> 10.2
- 2020 -> 7.5
- 2021 -> 4.2
The Ratcliffe chart has so many fluctuations till 2021 that I couldn't dare guess what their 2023 production was.
- 2017 -> 2.6
- 2018 -> 3.2
- 2019 -> 0.7
- 2020 -> 0.1
- 2021 -> 0.8
If I find the 2023 numbers, I'll add a comment or edit this one.
Even tho Drax uses only biomass and its CO~2~ emissions are 4 times higher than Ractcliffe's which uses coal, I think it is also important to mention that Drax can produce twice as much electricity in comparison to Ratcliffe. Still terrible news from the 2023 report, just saying.
Its generating capacity of 3,906 megawatts (MW),
Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station
the station has a capacity of 2,000 MW
This is a relevant article:
Hagai El Ad: Israel’s sham investigations cannot whitewash horrific abuse of Palestinian prisoners
And another relevant article:
Google DeepMind employees ask the company to stop providing AI tech to the military
Edit: And a podcast No Tech for Apartheid w/ Mohammad Khatami & Gabi Schubiner