sabreW4K3

cannot fact check itself let alone anything else. Why don't you do your own fact checking?

Why don't I render my own CSS? Firefox has the ability to pull alternative sources in the background and compare against my current page. What is wrong with that?

But the problem is, people think that there's one single development team working on Firefox and if they're working on AI, they're not improving or working on anything else.

People hate the term AI and so Mozilla were always going to struggle with providing modern functionality, as let's face it, the Internet is embracing AI whether we like it or not

There's AI in many forms in Firefox such as how it predicts the page you want to revisit from the address bar and translates content locally on device. If these AI capabilities were moved to extensions, it would probably significantly reduce the benefit users get from Firefox and likely prevent other useful features such as privacy preserving AI alternatives.

This is poignant. AI as we know it is basically what we were calling machine learning a couple years ago. The same people that are very vocally complaining about the advent of a smarter browser, are the same people that bemoan Mozilla for depending on Google for financing. Somehow they want a browser that only the most devout privacy evangelists would use and they want a browser that is self-sustained through diverse deals, none of which they're able to see or feel.

I feel like there's a lot of disingenuous Firefox supporters who want a utopia browser and refuse to allow Mozilla to do anything to evolve the browser. These same people talk up all the Firefox forks and that change a few defaults and yet bemoan everything Mozilla does that makes those forks possible. It's boring.

• I want a browser with on device translations.
• I want a browser with smart page suggestions.
• I want a browser that's able to summarise articles.
• I want a browser that can fact-check pages.

Betteridge's Law says no. Should they though? Hell yeah!

Warte, was? Das ist eine Sache? Warum hat mir das niemand gesagt? Ich will auch spielen!

Ich verstehe es nicht

I think the truck driver is thinking about riders in blind spots and so trying to solve proximity visibility with ambient light.

They're a good registrar in my experience.

It's a design blog, they'll always opt for overly designed things.

Okay, I'll bite. What makes it appear as an advert disguised as an article? Pray do tell.

I think the assumption that it's customers causing the problems is part of the problem. There's enough evidence to suggest drunk people will kick over perfectly packed bikes and that even people hacking bikes, leave them in the middle of the street. So again, I can public disorder problem, not Lime Bike problem.