qwertyasdef

joined 1 year ago
[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

I don't think Turing-completeness implies omniperiodicity. I'm imagining a cellular automaton which follows Game of Life rules on even-numbered generations and does nothing on odd-numbered generations, which is trivially Turing-complete because it's just Conway's Game of Life if you ignore every other generation, but also trivially has no odd-period oscillators.

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Going by the example in the Github, it looks like a right-to-left Lisp with Arabic keywords. Does that fully describe the language or is there more to it than that?

I'd be interested in hearing about the parts that are more influenced by Arabic than Scheme. Are there any beyond the keyword language and writing direction? Like a new keyword that does something useful but has no equivalent in Scheme because the concept isn't easily expressed by an English keyword?

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

As someone who knows very little about Scheme or Arabic, what are some aspects of this language that might be novel or interesting to someone with a background in mainstream languages?

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago

Hey, I like checked exceptions too! I honestly think it's one of Javas's best features but it's hindered by the fact that try-catch is so verbose, libraries aren't always sensible about what exceptions they throw, and methods aren't exception-polymorphic for stuff like the Stream API. Which is to say, checked exceptions are a pain but that's the fault of the rest of the language around them and not the checked exceptions per se.

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 19 points 10 months ago (8 children)

That texture healing looks super nice. Is that something fonts can just do or does it require special editor support?

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I might buy more from Epic if their launcher weren't So. Freaking. Slow. Even claiming the free game is such a chore that I can't be bothered to do it. It takes several minutes to load, responds sluggishly, and lags everything else on my computer the whole time it's running. The only game I play from them anymore is Celeste because I can start it without ever going through the launcher.

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Seconding this request, this is the number one thing that has me keep going back to other apps.

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago

If you don't need to reuse the collection or access its items out of order, you can also use Iterable which accepts even more inputs like generators.

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what is that spoilered book?

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 86 points 1 year ago (8 children)

...What are they actually launching though? I mean I love the payment scheme but I can't get excited over this without an actual good product being sold.

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do people actually use Epic? I wasn't much of a gamer before and didn't care for Steam, and my first real exposure to PC gaming was when Epic started their weekly giveaway of free games. I made an account, discovered some cool titles, and could have been a happy customer if only their launcher weren't so ridiculously slow. Now I can barely even stand opening the launcher to collect the free game, let alone trying to browse for games to buy.

[–] qwertyasdef@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

The one case where I prefer video is when I know next to nothing about the topic and the other choice is mediocre to low-quality writing. Most people aren't great technical writers, and it's easy to skip over steps either because the writer assumes too much prior knowledge or simply because it takes effort to put that information in. On the other hand, videos are the opposite where it takes effort to cut stuff out, so you usually get all the steps which is what I need when I don't know anything.

If I have the option of a well-written, step-by-step tutorial though, or if I already know the topic and have a vague idea of what I'm looking for, then text is much better for being able to search/skim/go back and forth at my own pace.

view more: next ›