nfld0001

joined 1 year ago
[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i can see the light at the end of the tunnel
then again it could be the train

Goes hard. Gonna save that line for later.

6
Cinema Stare – Deep End (www.youtube.com)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by nfld0001@beehaw.org to c/music@beehaw.org
 

This has scratched a punk itch that I haven't properly scratched since I was listening through Brand New when I was in high school.
I can recommend the whole album.

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I found myself a copy of Nineteen Eighty-Four printed by Harcourt, Brace and Company for $20. It didn't have its dust jacket, but everything else about the book seemed quite fine. There isn't really much on the inside indicating specifics, but everything I found about it online would suggest that it's the first US hardcover edition from 1949. It has to be the oldest book in my collection so far and my favorite from a publishing standpoint.

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 52 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

That's the wild thing—I've tried all sorts of ways and it reads like a viable meme whichever way I read it.

 
[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 4 points 2 months ago

I finally have my accommodations settled with the university and I started really using them. Joined a disability rights club and I started helping out a couple friends with their Discord servers. It feels like I have things properly tuned in to my pace for the first time in a while, and it feels like I'm seeing that pay off.

Also it's been a hot minute since I've been on. Glad to see things are holding up and glad to be coming back 👍.

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Admittedly, I agree with you in making the footprint leaner if it can be helped. The Lemmy UI and best practices working with that would ideally handle flagging the bot and let people make informed decisions from there.

I was trying to strike a balance between keeping it lean and keeping it visible. @rikudou’s concern was that spoiler folding would lead to people missing the bot as they scanned through the comments. At least with how Lemmy UI currently is, I have to concede that I think they have a point. Last I checked on the default Lemmy UI theme at least, the Bot flag is relatively easy to miss scanning through comments. Moderator and Administrator icons are already relatively low-key, but the Bot flag currently uses the more discrete body text color and no outlining. I didn’t even know bots had a name flag until you pointed it out.

It’s a delicate balance between keeping the comment reasonably slim but also reasonably visible. I think I was trying to come up with a solution that works with the limitations as-is, but your recommendation is definitely what we ought to go with in the long-term if we can make it happen. It seems to me like it would be better to solve a fair chunk of this through the UI itself rather than bulking up the copy.

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A couple of my local groceries sell packed chicken feet, and I absolutely love them for stocks. They’re packed with gelatin and I end up with silky stocks that look like Jello in the fridge. Store rotisserie chickens are also great for stocks in my experience. I get a meal or few out of most of the meat, then you chuck the rest in a pot to turn into stock.

I think at least one of my local groceries also used to sell ox tail. Great for beef stock, but I think it got expensive after it became a trendy cut for some reason. I don’t remember how that happened, I guess people got in the know 🤔.

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Better Than Bullion is some high quality stuff, but any bullion is great to have on hand. It’s hard to beat a fresh stock if time and resources permit, but I’ve just about entirely switched to using bullion derivatives instead of stock cans or cartons for lower effort meals. The stuff keeps for ages and is practically impossible to waste. Sometimes I used to have incomplete stock cartons and wouldn’t use them in time. That’s a non-issue when I’m making stock as I go with something like BTB or Knorr.

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Kosher salt, and by extension salting by hand with a salt cellar instead of using a salt shaker. Salt is some real basic stuff, I’ll definitely admit. But switching from table salt and changing up my salt game was a small detail that really got me into cooking.

I grew up in a house that was entirely table salt and salt shakers, so I didn’t learn about kosher salt until I started to learn more about cooking on my own. Handling kosher salt by the pinch and the hand made it much easier for me to develop an intuitive sense of seasoning food. If anyone is wary about over salting or doesn’t trust their salt shaker not to turn their meal into a salt lick, I highly recommend giving kosher salt and salting things by hand a try.

Adam Ragusea does a better job than I can at the moment of describing kosher salt’s context and advantages. I’ll leave the elaboration to him, but I’d be happy to give my personal perspective on details if asked. Apparently kosher salt is primarily an American thing according to him? I didn’t know that until reviewing the video for my comment.

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I get what you're getting at there, but I don't think it would necessarily be an issue. I think that if you were to put the summary itself under the spoiler and nothing else, it would be reasonable to provide a couple more lines to explain the bot. I'd think that even with a couple of extra lines of copy it would take less real estate most of the time than if the bot continued to just provide the summary and two lines.

I'm also recalling that AutoTLDR on Reddit had some extra bits like an FAQ and providing extended summaries. Links to that stuff might also help to balance your visibility. I think the bulk of your screen real estate comes from the summary, so this content would be less of an issue in comparison.


🤖 I'm a bot that summarizes online articles! This summary is X% shorter than the article:

Summary in spoiler[Filler text follows]
Oh, using ChatGPT to generate filler text, are we? How delightfully modern! Gone are the days of the monotonous "lorem ipsum" that Latin scholars might swoon over. Now, we can be graced with filler text in English, tailored to our whims by a machine that's fluent in more than just dead languages. Let's all take a moment to applaud the user's avant-garde approach to filling that empty space on a webpage.

But wait, there's more to this cutting-edge decision. Not only have we replaced a centuries-old tradition with a dash of AI flair, but we've also managed to make filler text even more inconsequential and pretentious. Why stick with the tried and true when you can have a machine generate something that's equally irrelevant but far more verbose? Truly, the future of procrastination is here, and it's dressed in a cloak of technological grandiosity. Bravo!


-

My programming is open source on GitHub and developed by @rikudou@lemmings.world. Contact my developer on either platform to ask questions, send feedback, and report issues.

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

On the other hand, maybe it could be hidden by a spoiler tag? I think @nfld0001@beehaw.org mentioned this being a possibility

Yep.

[Title][Content]

[Title]
haha gottem

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

If I want to talk about my hobby I should go make the content I want, but it takes… skill, and I just don’t have it. Also I’m new and don’t think I have a good grasp of what kinds of posts the community’ll like.

I'm mighty rusting at drawing myself; I'm admittedly a bit subpar at my drawing compared to my art peers, I'd wager. Getting back on the saddle and posting publicly feels a bit intimidating, but I think that's less community specific and more just general jitters. Something I'd like to embrace and encourage around here, however, is an appreciation for amateur work, questions, and input. The vast majority of us by wide margins are by no means masters of what we do, and I'd love to see what we offer given motivation and appreciation. Breaking out of the mentality I've carried from other places is challenging, but considering Beehaw's values, I'd hope that this is something I could put into action.
-

As for what the community likes, I'm starting to come around to stop trying to read the community's mind. I think the best way to find out what the community gets into might end up being to just start posting things and see for yourself. I'll admit I find it easier said than done to get into that mindset, and it means there's gonna be duds, but I also think it can help to stop that sort of content paralysis.

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

beehaw is only one instance, and I’d love to keep it an instance that I know is full of actual people.

That's an insightful way of putting it that didn't come to mind.

I think part of what Beehaw uniquely offers is the drive for its own kind of instance and user culture and a closer and more organic community. Bots, save for moderator tools, admittedly detract from that kind of vibe. I could imagine that sacrificing less necessary bots, either partially or entirely, could be an important measure toward securing those aforementioned values. Federation with more Reddit-esque instances still allows us to scratch Reddit sort of itch when it comes up.

 

This is a classic that's been in my favorites for ages.

In 1981, HBO hired Liberty Studios to produce a new program opener. The result was "HBO in Space". The original and variations of it were used by HBO in varying degrees for over a decade.

"A Closer Look: Inside HBO's City" is a 10 min behind-the-scenes look at the months long endeavor that gives a glimpse of the whole process: storyboarding the idea, designing a cardboard mockup to run the camera through and see what needed work, creating the city diorama, constructing and animating the HBO logo itself—both physically and with effects, and the final filming.

I always loved behind-the-scenes stuff growing up and still do today. I'm pretty sure getting the occasional peak at this kind of thing played a part in getting me into design.

plus its got that 80s vibe from the clothes to the clunky computers and a delightfully cheesy sounding 80's soundtrack 😎

6
delivery (www.youtube.com)
6
Cheese bacon (www.youtube.com)
 

i dont know what i love more about this bit

  1. Cheese Bacon
  2. the sense of Impending Doom i feel for everyone in the car that comes with "Quarter Pounder Delu…?"
 

certified Classic 🐝

 

AI-driven Denoise helps reduce noise in RAW photos, seamlessly. Improve the quality of your photos by preserving crisp details and removing noise.

I'm getting back into photography after not having the chance to do so this year. It looks like Adobe pushed out a pretty fine-looking update to Lightroom and Lightroom Classic a couple of months ago. If you can look past them calling stuff AI driven and AI powered for the buzz, there's some interesting stuff in here. I've experimented a bit with Enhance Denoise, and it looks pretty cool.

Enhance Denoise comparison

Pictured: A Ruby-crowned Kinglet (Corthylio calendula) perches on a tree branch on a cool Fall’s day, staring down the camera head-on. This picture makes use of Adobe Lightroom's Enhance Denoise feature. A full-size crop is linked to allow for closer inspection.


Pictured: The same picture as previous, except using Adobe Lightroom's conventional denoising tools. This picture also links to its full-size crop for closer inspection.

If you look closely at the pictures in the Lemmy interface, you just might be able to make out the differences between the two. Taking their full-size variants to another tab, however, makes spotting their differences a bit more noticeable.

My first impression is that Enhance Denoise appears to be a substantial improvement over the previous denoising options in Lightroom. I have to go gentle with the usual denoising tools unless I don't mind losing some finer details on a photo, and even then it's not going to always do a meaningful job clearing out the noise and there'll be parts that get overly smoothed out. But Enhance Denoise seems to let me have the cake and eat it too. Picture noise appears to be substantially reduced and the picture seems to maintain sharpness.

:

2x sized comparison crop

Pictured: The same picture as previous, with some cropping and resampling. The picture is cropped to the bird's head and doubled in sized to aid in comparisons. This picture makes use of Adobe Lightroom's Enhance Denoise feature.


Pictured: The same picture as the previous. This picture uses Adobe Lightroom's conventional denoising tools.

:
All that said, I feel a little hesitation with me using it. I'm noticing that, particularly on elements that remain well defined through conventional denoising, Enhance Denoise appears to make these elements too sharp. I'm pretty sure this may be counteracted with how I set the picture's sharpening, however. The AI moniker also gives me some hesitation toward AI specific issues. For example: "did those edge feathers really appear that sharp, or is the end result having me misremember it? There's talk of AI having the tendency to hallucinate information depending on how its prompted—how likely is it for the denoising AI to generate all-together the wrong thing while it's trying to denoise, and how much of a pain will that be to spot and correct?"

But then again, the older denoising algorithm has its own similar stack of issues that might make these feel less significant. Likewise: "how much can I denoise this until it's noticeably smooth? What is noticeably smooth, anyway? Was that a patch of noise I just had smoothed out, or was that actually part of a physical texture that was there?" As it so often goes, I think I'm gonna have little choice but to keep experimenting, keep seeing what feels right, and go case-by-case.

-

What do all of you think? Are there any other photographers using Lightroom here that would like to weigh in; any particulars on how you would treat an Enhance Denoise photo to brush up its quirks? Any lay people with their own thoughts of which they think looks better? Do either of the samples stand out as the better?

 

Whether you found it on a recommendation from others or on your own, we've likely encountered small corners online that delight us. One person or small team blogs that are surprisingly insightful, web apps or games that have been go-to's for ages, showcases and exhibits on a specific yet curious niche, striking art pieces.

Do you have any favorite websites that loosely fall in this grouping? What about it is delightful to you?

I'll give a couple personal examples that come to mind to get things started:

  • The Vidya Interweb Playlist: A relatively well-designed music player that exclusively plays music from a load of videogames. I can't remember how exactly I found this, but I have some good memories of it being a sizeable part of my soundtrack to my middle school years.
  • The Web Design Museum: A showcase of how various websites have evolved over the years. I think it's cool to see how things have developed with changing tech and changing tastes.
 

In this video I show off some different Lemmy instances and discuss why the lemmyverse and even some individual Lemmy instances can become a better alternative to Reddit.

(via. Odysee)


I dunno how the community collectively feels about Mental Outlaw in sum, but there's content of his that has its way of piquing my interests. He just put up a video showcasing Lemmy, some instances, and the mechanics/interactions between them. Probably old news for many of us, but I think it's always pretty cool to see Lemmy get its mention.

Beehaw specifically got its mention through the video and he briefly touches on Beehaw's defederation from sh.itjust.works. I'm pretty confident he disagrees with the decision, but his opinion and description of things struck me as balanced and respectable enough. I'd wager that a more precise description of the intrigue would likely take as much time as the video itself.

Any thoughts on Mental Outlaw's coverage of either Lemmy in sum or Beehaw? Anyone else seen creators they keep their eyes on give mention of Lemmy?

 

Caption

A Ruby-crowned Kinglet (Corthylio calendula) perches on a tree branch on a cool Fall's day, staring down the camera head-on.

Ruby-crowned Kinglets are tiny and energetic birds, although this specimen had the good manners to pose for the camera. The namesake ruby crown is a feature of male specimens. Their crown is typically kept down and discrete, flaring up when excited. The crown of this specimen, if even present at all, is unseen.

-

head-on pictures of birds always delight me. lil' dude's got what looks like furrowed eyebrows and a frown. i took their picture months ago and i still can't get over them. it's that angerey face 😡.

I'm fairly confident in their identification. Front facing birds can be a pain to narrow down, but I have a profile shot of them that gives enough identifying details for me to have more confidence.

Profile shot

Caption

The previously pictured Kinglet, still on their tree branch, turns to their right, giving a profile perspective.

🤓Setting

  • Location: Sedona Wetlands Preserve. Sedona, Arizona, US.
  • Timestamp: 2022-11-25T15:03:23-06:00

Picture specs

  • Camera make and model: Nikon D7100
  • Lens make and model: Tamron A022
  • Shutter speed: 1/800s
  • Aperture: F 8.0
  • ISO: 1000
  • Focal length: 550mm*

*This is a full frame lens on a crop sensor camera. Effective focal length is approx. 825mm.

view more: next ›