No, I meant lock as in disable login, remove email address, 2FA and freeze all content. This feature might not yet exist in lemmy but it probably should be implemented. Apart from a user leaving this might actually be required to properly handle a user passing away.
necropola
I thought beehaw.org
defederating from us would not affect post/comments on shared source instances, e. g. lemmy.wtf
, which is neither defederated from beehaw.org
nor us:
https://lemmy.world/post/149743
Why do I see posts/comments from beehaw users on communities outside lemmy.world and beehaw.org?
That's because the "true" version of those posts is outside beehaw. So we get updates from those posts. And lemmy.world didn't defederate beehaw, so posts/comments from beehaw users can still come to versions hosted on lemmy.world.
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/1b12/fep-1b12.md#the-announce-activity
After the group successfully verifies and wraps the received activity, it sends it to the inboxes of its followers. Followers then use the outer
Announce
activity to verify that the content was really approved by the group. After this step theAnnounce
can be discarded and only the inner activity shown to users.
Cloudflare Challenge?
Since lemmy.world
is now behind Cloudflare, is it possible that federation is hit by Cloudflare Challenges as described here?
No federation from source to lemmy.world
- local copy on
lemmy.world
: https://lemmy.world/post/2219417 - original source: https://lemmy.wtf/post/193323
No federation from lemmy.world
to source
- local copy on
lemmy.world
: https://lemmy.world/comment/1749875 - original source: https://lemmy.wtf/comment/761591
Note that I pulled my post to the source instance by searching for it from there, but updates/edits are still not federated. This post also has a reply from a lemmy.zip
user which hasn't been federated to lemmy.world
yet.
You can select more than one language by holding down [Ctrl] when clicking.
There is actually an ongoing discussion on GitHub about caching/proxy-ing image resources to improve performance and hide user IPs, etc.:
I'm not even sure that Threads will actually open up to the Fediverse since it would allow people to interact with users/content on Threads without needing an Instagram/Meta account and without using one of Zuckerberg's intrusive apps. People could actually ditch their Instagram/Meta accounts and switch to a Mastodon acount while still be able to interact with their existing/previous network.
There is actually a certain risk for Threads/Meta to loose users to Mastodon/The Fediverse. That's why my initial guess is/was that Threads will either only federate in one direction, i. e. only allow their users to access federated content but not the other way, or that Zuckerberg believes that his apps are so much "better" (despite their privacy issues) that people prefer them over a FOSS alternative.
Now I see that Meta's plan is much more clever. The mere threat of Threads connecting to the Fediverse is enough to begin the (E)xtinguishing, i. e. people (or are these Meta Bots?) are "threatening" to leave instances who do not proactively defederate from threads.net
instead of trusting their admins to actually have a close eye on the situation.
I do not trust Meta/Zuckerberg, because of its/his actions in the past. The very opposite is true for the admins of the fedivesre instances I have accounts on. So far they have acted very reasonable and worked their asses off to keep things running. That's enough for me to trust them on actually keeping a close eye on the situation.
Thanks @ruud@lemmy.world and all the other reasonable admins like @kev@fosstodon.org! You are doing a great job!
The user has been banned but those communities have not been deleted yet (for whatever reason).
Apparently adjusting in nginx_internal.conf
how requests are either proxied to Backend or Frontend depending on the content type helps on 0.18.0
.
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ansible/issues/106#issuecomment-1606222766
The Hammering, indeed.
OK, then I just wait and stop using this account until such feature gets implemented. Deletion is not an option as it would also delete all posts/comments. At least local ones, maybe even posts/comments on other instances. Dunno, if the User/Delete Activity is propagated to other instances (yet).
Bye and Thanks for all your hard work!