megalodon

joined 1 year ago
[–] megalodon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You can't really judge what a person does or doesn't deserve without at least knowing the individual.

what financial burden?

The one I clearly described in the comment you just replied to.

[–] megalodon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You make a good point. The system does incentivise ruthlessness

[–] megalodon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's dumb as fuck. The original argument is if a landlord doesn't take on the financial burden and give their property to someone for free then they are somehow evil. It's so stupid. And I don't know what the law is where you are but in the UK a landlord can't evict without a court order and that takes time.

[–] megalodon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I never called it a job.

[–] megalodon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's the point I was making.

[–] megalodon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why did you put the word job in quotations?

[–] megalodon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

And? Do you donate all the excess money you have at the end of the month to the homeless?

[–] megalodon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You just invented a scenario where the landlord stands to lose very little and the tenant stands to lose their life.

[–] megalodon@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Of all the anti-landlord arguments this has to be one of the dumbest. Of course a person is going to try to protect their income. I'm not a landlord but I'm not going to let anyone jeopardize my job.

[–] megalodon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Holy shit. You keep expecting it to end but they just keep going for 5 pages.

view more: next ›