leftytighty

joined 2 months ago
[–] leftytighty 8 points 2 weeks ago

If we want to uphold the principle of international diplomacy and the summit represents a huge bloc of the world's population then yes he really should. If Israel is hosting an event for dozens of countries he should. He's not just visiting his buddy Putin or Netenyahu. He's the main diplomat of the UN.

[–] leftytighty 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

The UN is a diplomatic organization that represents the entire world and exists to provide non-violent outlets for issues between nations. Being present at BRICS, which is rapidly adding membership and represents a counter-bloc to Western oriented alliances like NATO and the G7 (which expelled Russia in 2014.) is part of that mission.

Guterres was at the G7 summit https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/press-encounter/2023-05-21/secretary-generals-press-encounter-g7-summit

Why shouldn't he be at a similar summit representing:

Combined, the BRICS members encompass about 30% of the world's land surface and 45% of world population

The UN isn't (rather: shouldn't be) a Western organization. It's a global organisation. His attendance there is a necessary part of his duties.

From the perspective of any nation on the receiving end of US aggression his participation at the G7 would have been seen as equally upsetting. You're letting your bias in favor of Ukraine color your judgement.

[–] leftytighty 4 points 2 weeks ago

You had me believing you thought in the first half of your comment but then your proved otherwise

[–] leftytighty 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

But without capitalism we wouldn't have (insert something that has nothing to do with capitalism but that I completely attribute to it). And that would mean no trade.

[–] leftytighty 13 points 2 weeks ago

Hamas is really forcing you to continue making an ass of yourself in the comments

[–] leftytighty 5 points 2 weeks ago

Anarchists famously love Democrats enough to incorporate them into their graffiti

[–] leftytighty 3 points 2 weeks ago

Read the second sentence in that comment slowly

[–] leftytighty 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One must admire him not only for his willingness to help but for his dedication. Truly we were all wrong to assume the worst.

[–] leftytighty 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Is it really good hearted compassion or is it mental gymnastics trying to blame Hamas for this guy being a dickhead?

Using "maybe Hamas raped someone close to him" isn't exactly "turn the other cheek" in the context of being kind to bullies

[–] leftytighty 57 points 2 weeks ago

your arguments can apply to any situation and mean that nobody should ever be criticized for their behaviour.

Is that a useful way to look at the world?

No, which is why you only apply this apology to people you want to defend as a result of your bias

[–] leftytighty 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm not commenting on the pager attack when I refer to "accused hamas guy" but I'll leave it as an exercise to you to figure out why and how the pager strike might have led (and did lead) to civilian casualties.

Yes more precise than "was in a WhatsApp group with the cousin of a suspected Hamas member so the AI told us to bomb him at home with his children" but if that's the bar....

[–] leftytighty 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Maybe there was a conversation where the UNICEF worker said: "let's do a skit where you act like an animal and we film it because my parents have been kidnapped and are being held ransom under these demands" and the guy was like "no way I'm a nice guy" and the UNICEF worker pulled out a gun and said "I'm not asking" and the guy said "whoa man be cool fine I'll do it"

view more: ‹ prev next ›