ladyanita22

joined 1 year ago
[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes. For example, by not hiring him

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

And Steam is a show of success

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I read the changes, and it seems to me it was a stupid child. Not even someone malicious, but just a stupid love being edgy.

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I would create an LVM and combine the two to get 3TB in one logical disk.

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Debian is a great distro itself. I just happen to love Fedora and appreciate their stability (meaning, the software usually works very well)

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Let me suggest you to switch to Fedora, Arch or Opensuse. Debian Sid may have problems, and stable is simply too slow for how fast Nvidia is moving. My suggestion is to use Fedora or Arch, or Opensuse, with newer packages. Everything was super smooth on Fedora.

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No problems on my laptop. Mi Notebook Pro with that exact same GPU. On Wayland in Fedora since 36 everything's gone super smooth.

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

But the profiles are pretty poor and basic AFAIK.

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suggest you check Silverblue + Ansible (or CoreOS/IoT for server stuff).

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

For sure. I believe Debian's AppArmor integration is a little bit of an afterthought and there's lots of patches missing as Canonical likes to keep many improvements downstream.

[–] ladyanita22@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Nothing will make your system magically more secure, but SELinux is of great help when properly set up (as is in the case of Fedora).

 

Hi all,

I'm currently a happy Fedora user, but I'm attracted to the Debian world because of the sane choices Debian has mostly always taken. It's a phenomenal distro, with a lot of support (both internla and from 3rd parties), and that follows some of the principles I care about. It has a long support period, it's less opinionated than other distros, has a huge ecosystem and it's community-run. Also, it's an excellent distro for almost all use-cases: IoT, Server and Workstation.

I love Fedora, but it's not exactly an LTS release, so I have to jump ship to CentOS whenever I need something more stable. Not that I dislike that heavily, though, but I'd like to try the Debian world.

I am not opting for Ubuntu because the snapization of the distro, which is becoming more dependent on snaps as time passes. I like some stuff about PopOS, but some other stuff I don't. If I were to choose vanilla Debian, which one should I pick to be the most similar to Fedora?

  • Stable
  • Testing
  • Unstable (Sid)

I've read that Stable = CentOS, Testing = Fedora, Unstable = Rawhide/Arch. However, during the freeze period, neither Testing nor Unstable will actually behave like that at all. How long is that freeze period and how much of a big deal is it?

view more: next ›