So the pictures of burnt babies, beheadings of hostages, and undressed dead girls do not convince you that Hamas actually committed atrocities?
i3c8XHV
The Palestinian prisoners are not hostages. Comparing random civilians, elderly, and babies to convicted terrorists is Hamas level propaganda.
Israel is committed to destroying the army of Hamas, and to prevent it from ruling Gaza. It is not committed to destroying Gaza.
Hamas could end the war any minute. Pressuring Israel to let Hamas survive instead of pressuring Hamas to surrender and return the hostages is being pro-Hamas, not pro Palestinian.
So you're saying they need them for a ceasefire deal? Then why no negotiations for a ceasefire?
The experience with Gaza shows that simply putting a border between Israel and Palestine will not solve this problem.
I think Palestinians are not yet ready to make the compromise and allow Israel to exist with its Jewish majority.
I don't think the word "colonial" means what you think it means.
But just to make sure, what do you think the word colonial means?
How is citizenship related to this post?
"It's the imperialist culture that drew the borders", says person who apparently is completely unaware of the history of the middle east in the past few hundred years, nor in the geo-political forces behind the conflict in the past 75 years.
This seemingly simple comment already tells me you are pro-palestinian. Also, for someone that is interested enough in this matter to take part in this discussion, you show impressive ignorance.
So just to to troll you a bit, let me answer this way: Thinking that this crisis started when seven Arab armies attacked Israel with the proclaimed goal of "sweeping the Jews into the sea and pillaging the millions they invested in the country" is extremely short sighted.
You might be a cunning linguist, but I am a master debater
The fact that Europeans killed Jews doesn't mean that Jews weren't massacred in Muslim countries.
What am I missing in your reply?