i3c8XHV

joined 1 year ago
[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago

The Palestinians can stop the war in Gaza any minute. They could have stopped it yesterday. They could end it tomorrow. They could wlend it this very minute.

They could have had a Palestinian state. They could have a Palestinian state.

This is the ultimate truth that leftist media is working so hard to hide: The Palestinians don't want a Palestinian state. They want Israelis not to have one.

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 6 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

It seems thet for many here, Iran, Russia, and China are the good guys in anything and everything, and especially in their opposition to the US. So.... I'm not quite sure why this doesn't make the orange dude adored by this crowd.

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 31 points 6 months ago

That people are stupid because they don't have access to knowledge.

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You got me in the first half.

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Natural selection "asks" this question all the time. What you see around you are the different answers ;)

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Maybe their just trying to get you to spend more time with your family and friends?

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why is this list not sorted? Am I the only one confused by this?

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 0 points 10 months ago

The Israeli institution formally accepted the UN resolution that gave part of the land to the Jewish state and part of it to the Palestinians.

And yes, it happened in 1947, before Israel was formally declared.

And yes, the Palestinians rejected it and declared a war on Israel, stating that they "will push all the Jews to the sea".

BTW, what is bantustan?

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

You misunderstood me. Saying that Hamas should get out of the kitchen means that Hamas should not build their military infrastructure in civilian areas, prevent the population from evacuating, and then cry when there are inevitable civilian losses when Israel attacks Hamas. I did not mean to imply that attacking civilians is ok, it is not. I meant that attacking Hamas is the only current option left for Israel, and that if civilians are there, there will be civilian deaths.

About the quotes, I meant that evacuating a war zone is not ethnic cleansing. This is also the current situation in southern Israel, because of Hamas rockets and because some places attacked by Hamas were not yet rebuilt. This is also the current situation in southern Lebanon and northern Israel. You don't seem to be complaining about the ethnic cleansing of jews in the north of Israel, and rightly so, because evacuating a war zone is a very responsible thing to do. It only becomes ethnic cleansing in hindsight, when the war ends, if they are not allowed to return.

Also, why is ethnic cleansing part of genocide? These are two different crimes. They could come together, but can't ethnic cleansing be committed without committing genocide?

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

They are being ordered to evacuate a war zone that Hamas chose. Hamas chose to use them as human shields. Israel is trying to get them out of the warzone.

Would you prefer they were not "ethnically cleansed" to shelters in the south? Would you prefer they die when the IDF attacks Hamas infrastructure and militants in the active warzones in the strip?

Or is it just that you would prefer that Israel doesn't attack Hamas and leave them ruling Gaza and preparing for their next attack?

What was genocidal about my comment? Implying that Hamas is responsible for this war? Or is it that I'm implying that Hamas can end it any minute?

[–] i3c8XHV@aussie.zone -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

1947 called, it says you're misinformed, or worse.

view more: next ›