hobbes_

.....

It is on both the moderates and the left? Because neither group is enough on its own to win?

You keep asking this question and I find it very hard to believe you don't already know the answer.

I already refuted your "arguments" and repeating them won't change anything Terrance. You aren't going to make 1x1=2.

What's more likely, you figured something out that philosophers have pondered for millennia, or you just can't quite grasp the concept?

Come on Terrence, grow up. Just a little.

You know how Terrance Howard insists he knows that 1x1=2 and that he knows better than all of the greatest mathematicians in the world? That's you right now.

They've all pondered the "obvious paradox" that you see right through. If you think "it isn't a paradox at all it is just syntax mumbo jumbo" then you obviously think yourself to be smarter than them. That's basic inference, any philosopher of your caliber would accept that basic logic

Thanks!

This made my day ty

Coming from the person that thinks they are smarter than all of the collective philosophers from the past 2000 years. Rich.

No, you don't. Especially since you swapped it for a strawman which you also dont understand. This, just like the definition of a paradox, isn't up for debate. This paradox has existed for thousands of years and predates the Christian god itself. You are not "magically" smarter than the greatest philosophers of history, you are just far more arrogant.

Cheers bud.

You just replaced the word "paradox" incorrectly with strawman. Your issue is understanding what paradox means. The paradox stands. You also dont understand the full possibilities of "all powerful" since you keep applying things that couldn't be done by an all powerful being. If there is anything a being cannot do, then they are, by definition, not all powerful.

He literally cut one in half and showed how the air flowed and explained why it was different and more akin to deep frying. Maybe watch a video next time before critiquing it.

Tldr, no. To everything you just said.

Your "akin to saying" doesn't track with the paradox. It is really a matter of anything being "all powerful" which cannot actually exist. There has to be a limit to the power, even if it is itself. That's the entire point. It isn't "syntactical jargon" at all.

It is a bit more complicated than that. The WAY it moves the air is different than in a convection oven, so it "fries" a bit better.

This guy does a great breakdown of how it isn't "just a convection oven"

https://youtu.be/yw--NLjZBNk