gavi

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago

Please do!!! It would be so helpful

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. There needs to ideally be content warnings, or at the very least a distinction between NSFW and pornographic content.

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Admin for lemmynsfw here, and I just wanna say that we desperately need instance blocking for lemmy. Or at least some way for instances to be able to restrict NSFW content in /all. Some people do not want to see NSFW content or simply can't, and that's more than fine.

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

Another user posted this here above, !nsfwgaycommunities@lemmynsfw.com and it might be a good start

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you look in my profile, I moderate a few gay comms :)

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 year ago

It makes me sad, but it is what it is. I'm trying not to take it personally, but it does sting since I am a gay man, and an LGBT focused instance is a lovely idea in my eyes. We do not have a jailbait community, whatsoever. There are concerns about fauxbait that we are actively discussing and navigating. It did bring up a good conversation on that end at least.

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know it may seem like empty platitudes, but I want to make it clear for anyone reading this that our entire team agrees with more native ways in lemmy to block our instance as well as ways for instances to limit our content from federating into the all page. The fact that there is a lack of distinction between NSFW and pornographic content is extremely problematic as well, and ideally long term lemmy will receive content warnings like other activitypub platforms.

Porn isn't for everyone, but people are going to seek it out regardless. A space such as lemmyNSFW needs to exist to allow the people who seek such content out to be able to do so in a safe and controlled environment that focuses consent as a key principle. And in line with having the key princple being consent, making sure people who do not want to see content from our instance are able to block such content with ease is a no brainer.

Our team has also taken a step back and looked to what critiques there are in regard to our instance, as well as preemptively engaging with other instance admins as well. The conversations being had are important, and we are actively figuring out how to best navigate them.

Also, for those who may have difficulty believing in this position, heres a reply I made 20 days ago to the connect apps comm when a proposal was made to block instances. https://lemmy.ca/comment/857085

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 71 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Admin from LemmyNSFW here, not the one that posted but an admin nonetheless.

I'm not really down with this being presented as drama as some are trying to, it's unfortunate the way it played out but overall its their choice to defederate. We actively encourage other instances who forbid pornography to defederate from us. Lemmy.ml, sopuli, etc etc we are totally fine with, we have no malice or hate towards them because thats their choice and their reasons and concerns for doing so are more than legitimate especially with how limited lemmy is right now and the locations that they host their site at. We have open discussions with other instance admins and welcome discussions of their potential concerns, it's just we didn't really know what the concerns were beyond "this looks wrong because it looks wrong delete it" which made it extremely frustrating to try to figure out concisely what the problem was so we could address it.

My only issue is it being presented as if we are fine with CSAM, when we aren't and to be accused of that is extremely serious.

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 1 year ago

I'm not really down with this being presented as drama, it's unfortunate the way it played out but overall its their choice to defederate. We actively encourage other instances who forbid pornography to defederate from us. Lemmy.ml, sopuli, etc etc we are totally fine with, we have no malice or hate towards them because thats their choice and their reasons and concerns for doing so are more than legitimate especially with how limited lemmy is right now and the locations that they host their site at. We have open discussions with other instance admins and welcome discussions of their potential concerns, it's just we didn't really know what the concerns were beyond "this looks wrong because it looks wrong delete it" which made it extremely frustrating to try to figure out concisely what the problem was so we could address it.

My only issue is it being presented as if we are fine with CSAM, when we aren't and to be accused of that is extremely serious.

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It was. I had a conversation with the community moderator, and concerns were expressed due to the legal grey area it falls under. The mod was not punished nor was in any kind of trouble. The deletion was amicable. I gave the moderator a go ahead previously while it was discussed with the team and while we were figuring out how to best navigate our rules. After a bit more consideration and talk with the team and looking deeper into emerging AI laws, we felt it was too much of a grey area to leave up.

[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We will have a warning that pops up stating the site is for adults only and requiring you to click yes to access it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›