dbilitated

joined 1 year ago
[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i'm not sure i understand - it looks great, but how are you applying these?

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 62 points 1 year ago

at that price you could afford the reddit api.. not that i'd want to

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

installed... I didn't realise how much I missed it!

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago

if a mayor of a town in Afghanistan told everyone he wants the US to invade while bombs are falling on his countrymen? yeah. I'd feel the same way?

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

he probably should have expected that

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 17 points 1 year ago

actually agree, I copied the summary but it's more sensational than it should be.. I'm excited but I've just gone from 1% believing it to 5%, it's far from confirmed.

considering what it would mean I'm still super excited however.. but I'll edit the summary

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Berkley one is simulation, one is a chinese lab that seems to have replicated some of the actual material and confirmed some properties of superconductivity.

someone is tracking a lot of different efforts here: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/07/tracking-lk-99-superconductor-replication-efforts.html

wow

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

thank you!

this almost seems like it could be something 😬

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

According to the simulation apparently it only works if the copper atoms end up in an unlikely place in the crystal, so fabrication might be unreliable. I recall someone in another thread saying the authors themselves had around a 10% success rate. So other efforts to replicate are likely to see more failures until the fabrication is better understood. Makes sense I guess.

The fact that another team saw something I think is really hopeful, even if it's hard to produce and poorly understood, if there is a room-temp effect then it's only a matter of time before it's studied properly and understood. From there hopefully a reliable method of fabrication can be published.

If there is no effect replicated anywhere then the paper is fraud, but if there's any effect replicated then it's just a matter of study and engineering to figure out what it is. It would be interesting even if it isn't exactly room temp superconductivity.

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

wait, really? other people have confirmed this might be real? I'm not sure i'm ready for that.. i don't dare hope, you know?

but also, if another unrelated team has demonstrated room-temp Meissner effect, that means this might be true, right?

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

to be fair I thought the same! that's weird 🤯

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

yeah I'd prefer a PR that removes the filename and actually builds so it could be merged.. the emojis might be better as a comment. although json doesn't support comments iirc so maybe just a thoughtful commit message.

view more: ‹ prev next ›