bustrpoindextr

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
They didn’t refute their Jewishness. They “refute their Jewishness in a holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people,” which is precisely what you’re in c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
They didn’t refute their Jewishness. They “refute their Jewishness in a holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people,” which is precisely what you’re in c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
[–] bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

12/10 add in bud.

They didn’t refute their Jewishness. They “refute their Jewishness in a holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people,” which is precisely what you’re in c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
They didn’t refute their Jewishness. They “refute their Jewishness in a holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people,” which is precisely what you’re in c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
They didn’t refute their Jewishness. They “refute their Jewishness in a holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people,” which is precisely what you’re in c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
They didn’t refute their Jewishness. They “refute their Jewishness in a holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people,” which is precisely what you’re in c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
They didn’t refute their Jewishness. They “refute their Jewishness in a holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people,” which is precisely what you’re in c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
This may just not be the best packaging idea... in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[–] bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They don't really do anything at all to make you feel full enough that they actually satisfy hunger

That was my experience with Soylent, but huel works for me.

Install deb packages with its dependencies manually on mac mini - Broadcom firmware in c/linux@lemmy.ml
Install deb packages with its dependencies manually on mac mini - Broadcom firmware in c/linux@lemmy.ml
I'd like to get away from "arch bad for new users" in c/linux@lemmy.ml
[–] bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

pacman in my opinion is the easiest package manager ive used but even so if it is that difficult then they can use a GUI package manager that would come pre installed on most GUI arch based distros

Recognizing that's your opinion, in my opinion it's the hardest I've used. The commands are all flags, so you have to remember letters instead of "install" or "upgrade" if you want to use any packages outside of the like 4 in the official repos, you have to enable AUR, which is effectively just installing from source from some random person's GitHub repo, in which any number of things can go wrong. I mean, there's a reason there exist a bunch of different wrappers for pacman.

If a question is downvoted on !nostupidquestions, is the question too stupid or was it not stupid enough? in c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
[–] bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (11 children)

Okay but like, how often do I actually have to wash a hoodie?

1
spez (lemmy.world)
 

Let's go y'all

view more: next ›