bauhaus

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We come to serve

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Check it: !startrek@lemmy.ml

it’s not a new community, but I just joined the mod team and I’ve updated the community guidelines in this Community Update post. It’s more permissive and, I think, much more reasonable and transparent. Coe on over, and help revitalize the community!

Live long and prosper! 🖖

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Check it: !startrek@lemmy.ml

it’s not a new community, but I just joined the mod team and I’ve updated the community guidelines in this Community Update post. It’s more permissive and, I think, much more reasonable and transparent. Coe on over, and help revitalize the community!

Live long and prosper! 🖖

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Check it: !startrek@lemmy.ml

it’s not a new community, but I just joined the mod team and I’ve updated the community guidelines in this Community Update post. It’s more permissive and, I think, much more reasonable and transparent. Coe on over, and help revitalize the community!

Live long and prosper! 🖖

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Good news!

I’ve just been added t the mod team over at !startrek@lemmy.ml and have posted a Community Update with new community guidelines that outline a more open policy on discussions that includes the ability to express criticism without fear of your comments vanishing or being capriciously banned without warning.

However, there are (as outlined in the post) some guidelines about how those discussions should go. We don’t want unhinged rants about how you hate X that just devolve into toxic threads. If you’re going to be critical, make it constructive criticism that fosters civil discussion, and keep it relevant to the post you’re commenting on. Irrelevant tangents and a lot of toxicity will be curtailed. But, otherwise, we feel it would be disingenuous and dishonest to outright ban all dissenting opinions and the discussion of when Trek sometimes fails to hit its mark.

Rules are in the sidebar, and if you have any questions or comments, you can comment on the Community Update post, reply to this comment, or contact me!

Live long and prosper! 🖖

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The problem with buses is that most of the fleets are still running on fossil fuels. Buses also produce a shocking amount of waste in used tires. 

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Here in NYC, we switched to hybrid electric buses many years ago and are currently transitioning to all electric buses. I’m not sure about other cities. 

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

What kind of safety measures or adaptations exist currently to address an entire city’s infrastructure of tram/light rail lines?

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Kind of hard to be sarcastic when thinking about that

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I’m surprised he waited so long, honestly. all this tip-toeing around rigged elections and shoving his political opponents out of windows into cups of polonium tea is lot of work for a guy who has to shop for gigantic conference tables all day and poop into a collection bag for his secret service guys to catalogue for whatever reason. when you combine all of that with his busy schedule of genociding Ukranians, well… obviously, one of those activities will to have to go. an evil autarch has only so much time in the day!

view more: ‹ prev next ›