asjmcguire

joined 1 year ago
[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been the victim of fraud. Unfortunately - yes.
When I was younger and Chip 'n' PIN was becoming popular, many smaller shops had a Paypoint machine that would print the entire card number and CCV on the receipt. I was so paranoid about fraud, especially given that there was sufficient information printed on the receipt that anyone could do an Amazon order with those details. I used to get a black permanent marker and scribble the details out before putting the receipt in the bin.

Imagine my horror when a decade later, I learn that I have been the victim of fraud, and a type of fraud it was entirely impossible for me to prevent. In the UK fraudsters watch for new companies popping up on Companies House and then use the details to go on a shopping spree. The way it works is like this:

They see my name, address and date of birth on the website. They are looking for a name that matches their surname and first initial. So for me that could be Alexander Jones for example. They go to a retail park and pop into Argos. They order several thousand pounds of stuff. When they go to pay, the person at the counter helpfully asks "Do you have an Argos credit card? If you apply for one today, we'll transfer the balance of today's purchases to the card" and armed with my address, date of birth and name, and a card that already has the same surname and first initial as me - they are accepted for an Argos credit card. Post nothing for the goods they just bought and leave the store. They go next door to JJB sports, and then whole process repeats. "Do you have a JJB sports card? If you get one today...."

They visited 6 stores in an hour and repeated this process at all of them. And a week later I start receiving credit cards.....

It's a surprisingly common scam (or it was), brought on entirely by the shops bring pushed to get people to sign up for credit cards.....

I had to be on a register for several years, so if anyone tried to open an account or take out credit in my name, I would get a phone call to check if it was actually me.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

AN (or even) multiple admins signing NDA's does not mean anything for the functioning of the Fediverse though, admins are running software, many of them do not have the knowledge to go in and start making significant code changes to the protocol. That's what Codeberg is for https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep THAT is where changes to the protocol happen.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

For christ sake I don't understand why people aren't getting it. YES it is a dictatorship because it is not about any one instance - if it was just instances saying "I don't want to federate with Meta" and that was it - I wouldn't have a problem, that is a perfectly acceptable thing to do. But that's not what this is - this is instances saying "I don't want to talk to Meta, and if you want to continue talking to me, then YOU are not allowed to talk to Meta either" - explain to me HOW that is not being a dictatorship?

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Right.... so - the long and short of it is -

A company (any company) decides to integrate with ActivityPub, and the entire fediverse has a toys out of the pram moment every time that happens, gradually closing off into smaller and smaller federated circles, that stop federating with the rest of the fediverse.

A reminder, Tumblr are supposed to be adding ActivityPub.
Wordpress has.
Discourse I believe now has.

So who exactly is it that gets to decide which companies are and are not allowed to be part of the Fediverse?

It's all very very much like a dictatorship, whether you want to accept it or not - that's exactly how it is being operated.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

None of that addresses the objection that has been raised though.

If instances want to defederate from meta that is perfectly fine, the Fediverse is supposed to be about choice.
Instances should not however be able to dictate what OTHER people on other instances are able to do.

By doing so - that part of the fediverse is behaving in exactly the same way that they fear that meta will behave eventually.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I find the other demands going around even scarier to be honest.
"I don't want to federate with meta, but I also don't want to federate with anyone else who does federate with meta"

It's so terrifying that there are whole instances that are now attempting to dictate who the rest of the fediverse is allowed to federate with. And frankly I think it's a downward spiral if that is allowed. Because if they do it once, they will do it again and again.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I'm in the camp of welcoming meta to the fediverse, BUT - not bending over backwards.

If they start making changes that affect federation for them, then that is their problem. Treat meta as a platform, no different to mastodon.
Remember that the fediverse consists of more than just Mastodon.
If meta makes a change and suddenly pixelfed can't federate properly with meta anymore, it'll be a shame, but it does not mean that pixelfed should make changes and add workarounds so that it is able to speak to meta again.

Meta might think they have the power to do this, but they only have that power if we behave like they do.
If instead we take an attitude of, it's fine for you to be here, while you are being a good citizen, but if you start making demands - you are on your own.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (32 children)

I don't want to take away that choice. I personally don't have a problem with meta joining the fediverse, and in fact today I downloaded the app and created my account. I'm excited by the possibilities of being able to speak to my friends from my Mastodon account.

My point was more for the people who think that suddenly 1.2bn users are going to be showing up in this kbin instance.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I mean I find it quite ironic really that The fediverse has been screaming about how threads/meta will destroy the fediverse, but in reality - it is the fediverse destroying itself from the inside with this nonsense take.

And really - who wants to be part of that, it's actually batshit when you take a step back and think about what is being said:

"I don't want anything to do with X and I don't want anything to do with anyone else who has anything to do with X either"

OK, right now it's meta. But let's talk about lemmy, there are people on the fediverse who think the creators of lemmy are problematic - so what happens when we get "I don't want to associate with lemmy.world but also I don't want to associate with anyone else who does associate with lemmy.world"

Some instances defeded mastodon.social for problematic moderation, but they did not defed other instances that do still federate with mastodon.social.

It seems like an extreme reaction, and if the fediverse does die, it will be the fediverse itself that implodes rather than being destroyed from any company on the outside.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (40 children)

Right....
BUT -

You aren't going to see ANY of those 1.2bn users, until someone on THIS server follows someone on THAT server. That's the point of federation. It isn't like Twitter - you don't just see everything that everyone over there posts. It's no different on Mastodon - there has to be a social connection before posts start showing up here.

Put another way, if hateful stuff starts showing up on the Fediverse from meta users, it is because someone on the Fediverse is following the people posting hateful stuff.

When meta eventually starts federating - you aren't going to see posts from @asjmcguire until someone here is following my account.

As for if meta makes changes that makes federating hard, that's not our problem. If they make changes that make federating with THEM hard, that's their problem. There is no reason the rest of the fediverse needs to follow what changes meta make. It doesn't hurt us if they break federation with the rest of the fediverse. Meta is in reality no different to mastodon in that regard, it's just another platform - but for example Pixelfed isn't going to bend over backward to make life easier for meta.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if it helps, I can see your avatar.

[–] asjmcguire@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Create Home Assistant automation

Choose Homeassistant as the trigger
and Start as the event.

I tried to upload a photo showing this, but that doesn't seem to be working right now.

 

joehumphrey (@joehumphrey@writeout.ink)

I'm posting this here because I don't have the character limit needed to post it on my main account, so bear with me.


Something I just thought of. For a number of years, I received treatment for low testosterone. When I was born, I had a hernia surgery that damaged my right testicle and stunted its growth. When I was twelve, they removed it because they worried that it showed signs of becoming potentially cancerous. It wasn’t a big deal. I got a prosthetic and now I have one flesh testicle and one robot testicle. I’m a cyborg. Flash forward to my mid-thirties when I asked my doctor if my noticeably soft and high voice could be due to a lack of testosterone from my single testicle. He said it wasn’t likely but possible and ran some blood tests and discovered that my testosterone was almost totally bottomed out, possibly due to my testicular situation, and also from my obesity. So they started me on testosterone treatments. First, it was androgen gel that I rubbed on my chest and was warned to keep far from my wife, who would be affected detrimentally if she touched it. That I wasn’t comfortable with for long, so we switched to testosterone injections. I did that for years, and it made a difference. I felt my energy change, my mental health improved and, oddly, I felt more “masculine” whatever that means in my life. I’ve never been particularly masculine in the traditional sense, despite my size and general appearance. What I’m getting at, is that low testosterone was affecting my mental health, and taking supplemental testosterone improved that mental health, as well as my self-image because I felt more confident in my gender. I felt more masculine, which was great because I’m a man. No one ever once questioned my use of T for my mental health and self-image. It was just never a thing. The doctor figured out that this would help me, so they gave it to me because that’s a doctor’s job. To treat the health of their patients. I’m a cis man so I pretty much get what I want without much fuss. That’s a privilege I have and other people don’t. Because society is fucked in the head. So my question is why the hell is it anyone’s business? If someone started questioning my use of Testosterone to treat my mental and physical health, I’d tell them to fuck off and mind their own business. It’s got nothing to do with anyone beyond my family and my doctor. Again, that's my privilege. It boggles my mind that people receiving gender-affirming care are being denied that treatment because of how they identify. Hormonal treatment to help with mental and physical health, just like me. Treatment that helps align my body with my idea of what my body should feel and perform like. And most importantly, it’s NO ONE’S FUCKING BUSINESS. It’s absurd and offensive that trans people can’t follow their doctor’s recommendation and treat their health/identity concerns without being scrutinized, bullied, and even denied that care. Children who desperately need this care are being denied it and it’s leading to their death in many cases. The way we treat trans people is horrifying. It’s truly offensive. Things need to change and quickly. We’re losing babies because we’re allowing politicians and zealots and bullies to dictate the health decisions of children instead of doctors. That’s one of the most demented things I’ve seen happen in our culture in my lifetime. These are people trying to live their lives and treat their health in the best way they know how. More importantly, in the best way their DOCTORS know how. It’s no one’s fucking business. Tangentially, I could make a very similar post about abortion. I have an idea! Let's not get involved in other people's medical decisions! Can we do that please?

view more: next ›