That depends on where you live.
Yes, I know. That's why I said:
However, not a simple solution for everyone in every country.
That depends on where you live.
Yes, I know. That's why I said:
However, not a simple solution for everyone in every country.
You can by creating more accounts.
They literally said:
Perpetual growth in a finite system is impossible
I don't see how your comment applies to that.
Knowlegde growth may be sustainable, but it is also impossible to grow forever. (Supposing knowlegde is finite, which is, as far as I see it, the case as long as we make the definition of knowledge depend on characteristics like repition-free and new. For example, you could learn the number pi to even longer lenghts forever, but doing that is not necessarily something new to know as it's just a manifestation of a repition which was already discovered.)
I'm intrigued how you would explain that economies could grow independently of resources. From my perspective, it looks a lot like each and every form of economy relies somehow on some form of resource or resources. As resources are finite, economies can't grow forever.
Water? Over here it's just a plethora of sugar pearls.
It made me a better person.
If that is meant literally, how did it make you a better person?
Capitalism wherever it is found. Not just the USA.
Or Islam, Judaism, Hinduism or any other major religion.
But no, suddenly I am the maniac for believing that – in reality – we are pink elephants, hopping on the moon and imagining life as we believe it to be true. No one can prove I am wrong. But uh oh, sky grandpa mad.
(/s I don't believe anything. Just making a sarcastic point.)
Here is a nice visualisation of the logical paradox:
Wicca (English: /ˈwɪkə/), also known as "The Craft",[1] is a modern pagan, syncretic, earth-centered religion.
Isn't the firey interpretation popularized by Dante's Inferno?
Service needs workforce performing the service. Workforce are usually human resources. Thereby, limited again. Or did I get it wrong?