TinyPizza

joined 1 year ago
[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

point to the region on the doll sir

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This slaughter guarantees it will never end. You are beyond reason and I hope you live to see the fruits of vengeance the seeds you plant now will come to bear. I don't wish you or anyone harm, but when it inevitably comes, don't you dare for a second excuse yourself from the knowledge that you helped further this cycle of misery upon the world. "let he who seeks revenge dig 2 graves"

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You are invading, hence, you are responsible for your own actions. That's life.

Nobody but you dropped the bomb, pulled the trigger, made the decision. Israel has agency. They've used it to commit murder and they will come to be known as murders for it.

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So this is Israels Vietnam eh?

Tell me, when you go into perform brain surgery to extract a persons cancer, why are you using a 10 pound hammer to perform the operation? It's called a scalpel you clod.

Also tell me, if this is so precise then why are 40% of the fatalities children? That's 10% shy of the total percentage of the population they represent.

Minimal effort is being taken, if any, to protect the people you claim brave Israel cares about. What a joke!

30,000 active Hamas fighters according to Israel and you've already killed 10,000 people. 4,000 of them children. You are an unapologetic accomplice to a massacre that is still ongoing. You remember that, no matter how "moral" you tell yourself it is.

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Your right, their indiscriminate "accidental" murder makes it A-OK.

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's their naughty little kink and Israel knows how to do it just right.

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

I was told elsewhere that genocides only count if you mean it.
"Israel, Hamas, and the accidental genocide: Benni made a boo boo"

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

lol, sure puddin

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Israel says the group has about 30,000 fighters and an arsenal of rockets, including some with a range of about 250 kilometers (155 miles), and unmanned drones.
2.5 million / 2 = 1.25 million / 30,000 = 41 2/3
So roughly one out of every 40.
10,000 dead would mean about 244 Hamas fighters dead if the distributions were equal
let's say they're not, that they are targeted.
If the number were quartered, that's still 1/10 being killed. 9 civilians to 1 fighter death.

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Whoops, slipped on that genocide by mistake again! I always trust the word of murders, they make their intent so clear!

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Jews, the Muslims or all dogs?

[–] TinyPizza@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Genocide is any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

3 out of 5 doth still make it a genocide. That law.

Glad I could help you!

 

Since October 7, more than 3,257 children have been reported killed, including at least 3,195 in Gaza, 33 in the West Bank, and 29 in Israel, according to the Ministries of Health in Gaza and Israel respectively. The number of children reported killed in just three weeks in Gaza is more than the number killed in armed conflict globally – across more than 20 countries – over the course of a whole year, for the last three years.

 

Since October 7, more than 3,257 children have been reported killed, including at least 3,195 in Gaza, 33 in the West Bank, and 29 in Israel, according to the Ministries of Health in Gaza and Israel respectively. The number of children reported killed in just three weeks in Gaza is more than the number killed in armed conflict globally – across more than 20 countries – over the course of a whole year, for the last three years.

 

Since October 7, more than 3,257 children have been reported killed, including at least 3,195 in Gaza, 33 in the West Bank, and 29 in Israel, according to the Ministries of Health in Gaza and Israel respectively. The number of children reported killed in just three weeks in Gaza is more than the number killed in armed conflict globally – across more than 20 countries – over the course of a whole year, for the last three years.

 

Some people, communicating via satellite phones, have described the attack as the “heaviest bombardment yet,” according to independent journalist Sharif Kouddous.

“People can’t call ambulances or civil defense. We are being bombed in an unprecedented manner,” said an unidentified journalist at a Gaza hospital, according to a translation by The Nation’s Palestinian correspondent, Mohammed El-Kurd. “The sky around us just lights up [with explosions], and no one knows what’s going on.”

 

The Israel Defense Forces wrote to Reuters and AFP this week after they had sought assurances that their journalists in Gaza would not be targeted by Israeli strikes.

"The IDF is targeting all Hamas military activity throughout Gaza," the IDF letter said, adding that Hamas deliberately put military operations "in the vicinity of journalists and civilians".

The IDF also noted that its high-intensity strikes on Hamas targets could cause damage to surrounding buildings and that Hamas rockets could also misfire and kill people inside Gaza.

 

Physicists believe that an unknown force could be acting on sub-atomic particles known as muons.

 

“I was feeling like I was dreaming. It seemed so unreal. This is because my results did not match any previous results," said astronomer Kyu-Hyun Chae.

 

Article- Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez raised the possibility that Congress should consider subpoenaing Chief Justice John Roberts if he stands by his refusal to testify about ethical questions hanging over the high court.

"And so I believe that ... if Chief John Roberts will not come before Congress for an investigation voluntarily, I believe that we should be considering subpoenas," Ocasio-Cortez told CNN's Dana Bash on "State of the Nation" on Sunday. "We should be considering investigations."

Ocasio-Cortez repeatedly blasted the court last week as Roberts and the five other conservative justices handed major victories to the right that effectively ended affirmative action, opened the door to discrimination against LGBTQ+ Americans, and axed Biden's current student loan forgiveness plan.

The New York Democrat took particular issue with the court's ruling in Biden v. Nebraska, arguing that Justice Samuel Alito's acceptance of billionaire Paul Singer financing a lavish fish trip undercut the court's "legitimacy." According to ProPublica, which broke the news of Alito's Alaska fishing trip, Singer has given millions to the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank that has taken public positions on a number of cases pending before the court — one of those cases was Biden v. Nebraska. Alito, in an extraordinary Wall Street Journal op-ed, denied any wrongdoing or that he has discussed court business with Singer.

—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 30, 2023

"This SCOTUS' corruption undercuts its own legitimacy by putting its rulings up for sale," Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter after the decision.

While Republicans control the House, Ocasio-Cortez pointed out that Senate Democrats are investigating the numerous reports about unreported gifts to the justices through the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee. But Roberts has thus far declined to appear before the panel.

"Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee by the Chief Justice of the United States is exceedingly rare, as one might expect in light of the separation of powers concerns and the importance of preserving judicial independence," Roberts wrote in April in response to Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin's invitation.

Along with his invitation, Roberts sent along a statement about ethics that he said the eight other current justices had agreed to try to follow. But the statement reaffirmed the belief that only individual justices should decide whether or not they should recuse themselves.

view more: ‹ prev next ›