Sordid

joined 1 year ago
[–] Sordid@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Truly a cutting-edge idea.

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

"Well of course I know him. He's me."

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Talking is not going to get them to leave Ukraine.

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Depends. Do I need to win or is a draw an acceptable outcome? If it's the latter, the blue whale. What's it gonna do, beach itself?

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

it’s considered common knowledge that you can’t

I've never heard that before. What I have heard several times is that text is not static, so if you read something, look away, and then read it again, it'll say something different. That I can corroborate, along with the idea that this is how you realize you're in a dream and induce lucid dreaming.

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As does Steam and Epic and every other digital store ever created.

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Replaying old games that I have fond memories of. We're in an incredible renaissance of classic games getting source ports or updates that bring them up to modern standards, and I'm loving it. Daggerfall, Blade of Darkness, Jagged Alliance 2, Morrowind, Jedi Knight, Caesar 3... I'm sure I'm forgetting ~~some~~ many. They let me forget the present and pretend that I'm back in simpler, happier times, at least for a little while.

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Explain how it was a convenient excuse?

Roosevelt wanted to get involved but had no way to get the public to go along with it. The Japanese helped him out.

if the US could have used nuclear weapons right after the attack to prevent entering the war, regardless of their transportation method, they would’ve

And how exactly do you imagine the US could've used such weapons against Japan without transporting them to Japan?

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The entire reason why the US entered the war was because of the attack.

No, that was a convenient excuse. Roosevelt must've thought Christmas had come early when he got the news.

Do you think if they did, they would’ve used them immediately to force a quick surrender instead of dragging out the war for years causing millions of deaths?

No, because B-29s didn't exist yet either, and they couldn't take off from aircraft carriers in any case. The US would've had to conquer its way across the Pacific to get within bomber range either way.

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Wow, that's extremely generous! Can I have Vane, please? I love games where you play a bird.

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why do you think most crimes are property crimes? Because the law is only to protect property.

That's just blatantly untrue, all kinds of actions are criminalized that have nothing to do with property. My hot take is that most crime is property crime because that's the kind of crime that the perpetrator actually benefits from. If you steal something, you now have that thing. If you murder someone, you're not any better off than before (aside from whatever loot your victim might drop, which is generally not worth it).

[–] Sordid@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's less of a peaceful reform and more of a war crime.

view more: next ›