It doesn't bother either of us to be using the same login on the computer. And it doesn't really bother her that firefix is installed nor me that chrome is.
And since chrome is sitting right there, it's the easiest way to use my therapist's video service.
Did I say easy? I think I said ideal.
I do have both installed, but it's easier to use chrome for the one use case I have since it's going to be installed anyway for her
Edit: oh you mean a user agent switcher too... Well, that seems like work 😛
Welllll I also have the other use case of my partner refuses to switch, so she wants chrome on the computer too.
Like a fancy butler with a towel on his arm, except, you know. On his dick.
It doesn't sound like they excluded trans or genderqueer people, they just ignored their gender. Or maybe I'm reading it wrong, but?
Last I read regarding trans brains: it's a confusing mishmash and unclear if brains are even as sexed as they seem outside of just size. If they are though, it seems like probably trans brains are at least somewhere in between? More research definitely appreciated.
I mean the paper you quoted keeps saying "gender" ...Is it actually for affirming trans folks? Big if true but I obviously didn't read the source material.
Because it would affect rich folks more, so they spend some money now to convince lawmakers not to charge them more later.
Tsk, tsk, this willow wants to get rid of THE definite article, but they're too afraid to even say it.
Oh, you mean Watergategate?
I did get curious and try to dig up if those irises were classified by gender identity or agab, and neither the paper quoted nor the paper they cited as the source clarify on that point. They do only use the word gender, though, never sex.