ShortN0te

joined 1 year ago
[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago

SLC drives have around 100,000 write cycles. Most consumer SSDs are QLC now and those have less than 1,000 write cycles

Source needed. The amount of write cycles is dependent on the actual quality of the flash.

Also sources needed for "most SSDs are QLC now" maybe true for bottom of the barrel cheap useless SSDs.

Also, the amount of write cycle does not mean much without knowing how many flash chips you have on the SSD. A 1tb ssd can consist of 1 or 16 flash chips.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Also, if the data were encrypted, the encryption key would have been on the Computer anyway, but yes it could have been better protected.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

EAS is not implemented so imap and pop3 only. But i heard they currently work on EAS and should be arriving in the near future.

For EAS there is also a paid plugin Owl i think.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, you can do this process to automate it.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You can use ACNE DNS. Just add the single record for acne dns and then you can the acne dns api to fulfill the challange.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OP uses tailscale to connect to everything and not his local connection.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Jellyfin doesn’t have local allowance baked in? I’ve never used it.

Nope and that is also not needed, since it's not a cloud dependent service.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Your entire argument was "Ah is useless and Wh gives consumers the information to determine battery life" So go ahead, determine the battery life.

Not quit sure where battery life is comming from, thats not my argument. To restate and also better phrase my argument: Stored energy is the better measure for consumers for the quantification of the battery size in a consumer device compared to ~~Ah~~ stored charge.

Now i can cross compare devices based on that and do not have to worry about the Voltage of the battery of any other devices.

Please state the calculation that you would use to "determine how often you have to recharge" that is valid for Wh and not for Ah.

I never claimed that this is possible. I wrote "can recharge" not 'have to". I am referring to devices like a power bank which i can calculate with a simple:

powerbank has 100Wh and phone has 25Wh so 100/25=4 -> i can recharge my phone 4 times using that powerbank.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you can cite a single source where the manufacturer gives a specification that would give battery life in Wh, and not in Ah, I will concede the entire argument and say that you were right the whole time in every comment make a note that you were right.

Basically every Laptop manufacturer.

Primary Battery

3-cell, 54 Wh, ExpressCharge™ Capable, ExpressCharge™ Boost Capable

https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-computer-laptops/latitude-5550-laptop/spd/latitude-15-5550-laptop/s0035l5550usvp?ref=variantstack

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I am ONLY speaking from a consumer position and for those Wh is more useful.

The consumer looks on device a and on device b and then determines how often he can recharge its device. With Ah you cannot do this unless you know the Voltage, with Wh you can make this decision without any further knowledge.

Yes this does not include battery life or conversion of efficiency. But a cunsumer measures nothing he looks at the lable.

It is fine if you don't understand electronics, but then don't spit out misinformation.

Btw. no need to insult me. I have never put out misinformation, I may have not stated enough that I am viewing this as a consumer.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The thing is, it does not matter how much charge the battery holds, it does matter how much energy it holds. Without knowing the Voltage the Ah is useless.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then using something like fail2ban to block bad acting connections is far more effective and you even get a security benefit out of it.

Also, when a few scripts try to connect via ssh DDOS your router then something is messed up. Either a shitty router from 20 years ago or you have a Bandwidth lower than 100kbps.

view more: next ›