QZM

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] QZM@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (5 children)

If you publish in a journal that has closed access, there is generally no fee to publish.

What field are you in? In the life sciences, there's normally a fee to publish closed-access and a higher one for open-access. My last paper was open access and costed about 3500, compared to 1500 pay walled.

[–] QZM@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] QZM@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is actually an amazing idea

[–] QZM@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Always thought it's a play on machine learning, but I'm most probably wrong.

 

I don't really use QuPath, I don't like it. But the person before me used it to annotate images and now I need to transfer these ROIs/Annotations to ImageJ where my pipeline is. Managed to find a good script for exporting with annotations, but it seems this person transformed the images (differently each time fml), and I need them to be the right orientation because I'm transferring those annotations to another set of images of the same samples from another microscope. Needless to say, I need to do some image registration, a very easy task /s. So is there any way to at least revert back to the initial orientation before export so I make the registration easier? I'm using SIFT which isn't really capable of accounting for mirroring/flipping, so that step really needs to be fixed beforehand. Any ideas? Or at the very least, is there a way to extract transformation history from the Metadata or so such that I can at least use that info to programmatically revert in ImageJ?

[–] QZM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Mate... I'm not saying you're wrong, but if I don't see the paper for myself, I'm inclined to be critical of your summary of it. I don't disagree that it is plausible conservatives indeed are more wealthy, but you have too many assumptions in your comment for any proper conclusion to be taken.

And the idea about altruism isn't really mine, it's a very very old and still existing idea in philosophy. Of course it has proponents and opponents, but it hasn't really been rejected to a degree sufficient to dismiss it, it just remains like pretty much all philosophical concepts, debated. So claiming it is false is a bit arrogant, especially without a proper argument. It would be like claiming free will exists or doesn't exist with confidence (and this analogy is ironic because egoism is a significant part of the free will debate).

And btw, before you think I'm defending conservatives, you should know I'm a scientist, so I am critical of anything and everything until I see the evidence, and even then, I am critical of the way the evidence was gathered and how it was interpreted. I'm not trying to be "pedantic," I'm trying to be accurate, because a minute twist on the truth makes it false.

[–] QZM@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Potentially controversial comment:

rich people with no morals live longer, because they’re entirely self interested, and being entirely self interested they can afford healthcare, thus living longer than non-conservatives on average.

From a philosophical point of view, everyone with absolutely no exception is "self interested." I believe the idea you're talking about is whether bettering the lives of other has been incorporated in your identity at a young age making your self-interest ultimately beneficial for others. It's a complex topic, but the idea is that you don't really truly do anything for others, ever, but if someone convinced you that if you don't do good by others, then you should be ashamed or that if you do, you're a better person, then you do good for others for your own sake, to view yourself in a better light.

I'm a bit confused about your comment though. Are you arguing that the study found that rich people skew the data because of their longer life? If so, I find that hard to believe given the proportion of "rich people," and the consequently negligible ability to statistically skew a population if it were actually randomly sampled.

[–] QZM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
 

This community was inspired by the subreddit ImageJ and of course image.sc. It's meant to be a hub to show and tell your pipelines and codes, ask questions about scripting and approaches in any image processing software, bring new ideas and cool tricks, discuss how the field is evolving from classical towards computer vision and machine learning approaches, and much more. We're still a small community, and we'd love to have you to grow and become a lively hub of discussion of this awesome field.

 

I came across a small script that opens a window with a progress bar that increases after the completion of every iteration in a for loop. It's pretty useful in a big macro cycling through many images. Sometimes you just want to know your progress in batch mode. So here is the helpful script (from https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/macros/ProgressBar.txt):

// Progress Bar
//
// This macro demonstrates how to display status
// information and a progress bar in a text window. 
// It uses the Plugins>New>Text Window command
// to open a text window without a menu bar.

  title = "[Progress]";
  run("Text Window...", "name="+ title +" width=25 height=2 monospaced");
  for (i=0; i<100; i++) {
     print(title, "\\Update:"+i+"/"+100+" ("+(i*100)/100+"%)\n"+getBar(i, 100));
     wait(200);
  }
  print(title, "\\Close");

  function getBar(p1, p2) {
        n = 20;
        bar1 = "--------------------";
        bar2 = "********************";
        index = round(n*(p1/p2));
        if (index<1) index = 1;
        if (index>n-1) index = n-1;
        return substring(bar2, 0, index) + substring(bar1, index+1, n);
  }

Note: if you using other nested for loops, ensure that the variable you choose isn't the same as the one here (i), except of course the for loop you're actually trying to find track the process of. Happy macroing!

 

First of all, I am so happy that we're getting more and more members. Thank you all for joining!

I'm going to post the first question on here. Ideally, we should always try to post example images when asking a question, but I'm hypocritically not doing it mainly because I think it's a straightforward question.

I'm trying to do some analysis on histology images using ImageJ macro scripting (IJM language), and at some point in the script I have the coordinates of an approximate center of a cell, derived from it's cell body center of mass. However, my downstream quantification requires that I skeletonize. But now the coords may or may not fall on the 1-pixel wide skeleton. I need it to fall on it for subsequent analysis, so I want to find the nearest non-zero pixel to these coords on the skeleton image.

I did come up with an approach, and the script is enclosed below. But.. it's a bit slow, and it needs to be much faster because the script is gigantic.

The approach simply makes a circle centered on the coords I have, and the circle is only 10 pixels in radius, because it appears that's enough to capture the skeleton's nearest white pixel in all cases. Then I iterate through every pixel in this circular ROI computing its euclidean distance from my coords only if it's non-zero (white).

Question: So you see how it's not a quick approach, and if there is a plugin to do this instead, it would be so much faster because it's skipping the wrapping. For context, this is part of a nested for loop for many many objects in many many regions in hundreds of images.

Here is the code:

// Making a circular 10-px radius ROI centered on coords
makeEllipse(CoordX-10, CoordY, CoordX+10, CoordY, 1);
Roi.getContainedPoints(containedX, containedY);
// Iterating through all pixels contained in the search circle
// Euclidean distance is calculated for non-zero pixels and tabulated
Table.create("Non-Zero Contained Pixels");
for (p = 0; p < containedX.length; p++) {
	value = getPixel(containedX[p], containedY[p]);
	selectWindow("Non-Zero Contained Pixels");
	// Keeping indexing for the table independent of the loop as many pixels will be skipped
	outOfLoopSize = Table.size;
	if (value == 255) {
		distance = sqrt(pow(containedX[p]-CoordX, 2)+pow(containedY[p]-CoordY, 2));
		Table.set("CoordIndex", outOfLoopSize, p);
		Table.set("Distance", outOfLoopSize, distance); 
	}
}
selectWindow("Non-Zero Contained Pixels");
// Sorting by distance and setting new coordinates
Table.sort("Distance");
Table.update;
nearestNeighbor = Table.get("CoordIndex", 0);
// Setting the new seed pixel for downstream quantification
seedX = containedX[nearestNeighbor];
seedY = containedY[nearestNeighbor];
close("Non-Zero Contained Pixels");
// Add computed seed for Sholl analysis
// i refers to a much larger for loop, just writing this for contextual information for this script excerpt
selectWindow("Skeleton" + i);
run("Select None");
Overlay.clear
updateDisplay();
makePoint(seedX, seedY, "small yellow hybrid");

Thanks a lot! And keep spreading the word :D

[–] QZM@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

That last neighbor bit.

Editor: remember, you need to have a statement about negatives or limitations, can't have only positives.

Writer: uhh you got it, boss, I'm sure I can think of something.

 

I know I'm not posting anything, but I didn't abandon the place lol. I'm just waiting to have at least ten or so members, because it's a problem-solution oriented community, so we need someone to come in and drop a problem so people can offer solutions. I'm very inexperienced in these things, so I have no idea how to promote this place to grow it, any ideas?

[–] QZM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not my field, but I don't think it's even possible to really pinpoint "the" most recent evolutionary step, not to mention being able to define "step" in an incredibly slow variable with multiple layers of continuity (individual, population, and whole species levels).

But I would say that it is very recent for sure, as lactase persistence is a trait that really only started (above "noise" level stochastic mutations in the population) when we started using dairy some 6000 years ago because of selection pressure.

 

I want this place to succeed and grow, so let's get active!

 

Kinda sad, I'm the only one here lol. But given the beginning of the downfall of Reddit, I thought I'd migrate here and make a community about my interests. I hope whoever joins spreads the word and we can make this a lively, informative, and helpful community for all image analysts out there. I mostly work with FIJI (ImageJ) and ilastik, and I hope all the new joiners have other expertise that can diversify this community more and more.