Pseu

joined 1 year ago
[–] Pseu@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

As a supporter of the voluntary human extinction movement, I agree.

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Context: the song The Dead Flag Blues by Godspeed You! Black Emperor

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is what I do when I can't unsubscribe in a minute. No reason to waste time on this, it is a solved problem.

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

So 1kg is around 61,000 USD at the moment.

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Cancer risk from radiation is not just the absolute amount of exposure, but the duration of the exposure as well. Short high-intensity radiation doses carry higher risk than long, low-intensity doses.

And 100mSv/yr is a rate, which is greater than 44mSv/yr. After 4 years, you will still have not had the dose needed that is linked with increased cancer risk.

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Is there any reason to use "sex organs" over "reproductive organs"?

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Pseu@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

I'm personally of the opinion that the hints aren't for the UFO expansion, but it's probably teasers for the World War 3 event, combined with camera artefacts and general player secrecy.

It's sad too. Everyone wants some good new DLC. All this PvP shit is getting out of hand. :(

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you're not upset, why'd you call them cunts?

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's only a small handful of cars that have primarily electronic door handles. Teslas are the worst because opening the door without power is very different than opening it with power and sometimes breaks the window. I think it was Mercedes or someone who has a power lock but the manual release is part of the same lever, you just pull it out farther.

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Copyright is not ownership. You can own something, but not hold the copyright to it.

Personality rights are also not copyright and as the ruling was not about personality rights, it did not affect these rights (where they exist in the US). Disregarding both AI and the recent ruling, if someone takes a photograph of you, you do not hold the copyright to it, the photographer does. If the photographer then does something with that image that harms your reputation you may be able to sue.

And no, it is unlikely that there is a distinction between one's likeness and "AI generated likeness," it usually doesn't matter if you use a photograph or a drawing of an individual, it is the identity that is protected regardless of what tool was used.

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Workers will try, and some will win but many will lose. The company switching to AI assisted work is already going to be laying off a sizable portion of their workforce. If anything wages are going to go down due to the productivity gains as hiring will be easier.

Now if workers have a strong and useful union, they might have the leverage to negotiate favorable terms. But without that, the benefits of technological capital does not go to the workers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›