OldPain

Pretty much

True without question or dispute! But the fact that it happened doesn't surprise or really outrage me at all. I hope it doesn't seem like I'm excusing it. Someone in her position should not be doing things like this in public no matter how discrete they may have been.

But I've also worked in movie theaters, so I know for certain this is not uncommon behavior. Every person who works at a theater rotates between jobs, one of which is a theater checker. You've probably seen them come in sometimes with flashlights. And yeah...Forgot where I was going with that but I think you get it.

Yes exactly. That's exactly what I said I did. Word for word.

American of European descent and share your sentiment exactly.

Dude, I couldn't agree more. I've worked in movie theaters and still didn't know there's cameras on the audience.

That clears up my specific confusion perfectly! Thanks!

Read the article and was confused. Good thing there's a comment section to ask questions.

That's a loaded question. Nobody saw anything sexual. Only the surveillance camera. And now the people who watched the footage.

People were complaining about her for other things. Nobody said anything about anything sexual, because nobody saw anything. Only the surveillance camera.

Solid point!

So what does this mean? He was the main contributer. Is Nouveau the only open source driver Nvidia cards can use on Linux?