MrMakabar

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] MrMakabar 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A lot of US oil wells are using fracking. Fracking produces oil and gas very quickly, but the well also declines quickly. First year decline for tight oil is 50% and second year another 30%. For shale oil itvis 34% in the first year.

Those two make up over half of the US oil and gas production. So no permits would mean US oil production falls by a third within 2 years or so.

https://jpt.spe.org/life-after-5-how-tight-oil-wells-grow-old

https://www.hartenergy.com/exclusives/why-us-shale-production-declines-are-higher-you-might-think-188251

[–] MrMakabar 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The ClimateActionTracker website itself actually has a lot more details on individual countries, their targets and the policies they implemented. You can see by how much they miss their targrets as well. For example the US is pretty close to the 3C line.

https://climateactiontracker.org/

[–] MrMakabar 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Degrowth argues that due to resource constraints, we need to cut some production as to stay within the resource constraints of the planet, while using the resources we have to provide a good quality of life for everybody. So post-scarcity economics is seen as impossible. However cutting production does mean less work time and systemsclike UBI are seen as key to make sure cutting production does not cause unnecessary harm.

Ritchie wants to solve the global Souths problems, by growing the global economy using green technology with resource constraints not being a problem due to technology. So keeping steady to move to a post scarcity world. She does this, by looking at very real trends and believes they moszly just continue

[–] MrMakabar 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China has been waiving no intrest loans, which can not be repaid. Debt restructuring inckuding forgiving loans is part of a debt trap too.

Beijing, which has come under criticism for its lending practices to poorer nations, accounts for almost 40% of the bilateral and private-creditor debt that the world’s poorest countries need to service this year, according to the World Bank. It has helped forge recent debt-relief agreements, participating in the Group of 20 suspension of repayments during the pandemic.

(From the Bloomberg article) The amount is certainly right and already working with the Western lenders as well.

The AlJazeera opinion piece you linked shows pretty well, what it means. After all the IMF adjustment programs were how the West was able to exploit the South. China is starting to take part in that exact process.

Obviously those are just loans. Do you seriously believe they sign documents named "debt traps"?

[–] MrMakabar 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The EU emission targets would require about 37% of cars sold to be EVs starting next year. That is nearly double the current level in a few months. Combined with low car sales mainly due to work from home being more populare since the pandemic and car makers have a decent challenge to solve. Also they can not just buy Chinese due to tarrifs.

Also the German government has already declined to work towards lowering those targets. It is the German car industry calling for it.

[–] MrMakabar 3 points 1 month ago

Partly, but also genetic diversity due to geography(islands and moutain ranges for example) and the tropics just being more diverse. Just compare the Taiga with the Amazon rainforest.

[–] MrMakabar 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So if you want the Republicans to be anticapitalist, you only need to make renewables cheaper then fossil fuels?

[–] MrMakabar 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

https://nation.africa/oped/opinion/Kenya-must-avoid-China-debt-trap-or-fall-into-Sri-Lanka-pit/440808-4551200-kv7y59/index.html

https://www.news24.com/fin24/Economy/South-Africa/da-demands-details-of-r370bn-chinese-loan-warns-of-debt-trap-20180916

For example, but that took me a minute to find. Just asking for proof does not work, when the other site is unable to argue its case beyond "I looked into it". Not even an unsourced explanation of how Cowbee came to the cconclusion. Only that it is supposed to be "obvious".

I doubt I get a reply from Cowbee due to that.

[–] MrMakabar -2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

So you consider North Korea or Eritrea to be better then the US? Seriously?

Can you proof China is not debt traping poor countries?

It is very easy to call the US the worst country, when you ignore the bad other countries commit.

[–] MrMakabar 1 points 1 month ago

KA-52 cost 20million, but offers fairly little which could not be had for less using drones or artillery and fighter planes are not much more expensive, but are more capable.

[–] MrMakabar 2 points 1 month ago

Only? The Saudis own Manchester City, Qatar owns PSG. The Saudis paid Ronaldo half a billion to play in the Saudi league and he is not the only one with an insane contract. Never mind Qatar building a bunch of stadia just to host the world cup and the Saudis paying FIFA to make them host in 2034 by making Spain, Portugal, Morroco, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay hosts of the 2030 world cup.

[–] MrMakabar -2 points 1 month ago (8 children)

China is currently debt trapping most of Africa. They pretty much appointed the current dictator of Zimbawe for example.

The way I look at good and bad is on a scale. Whenever a country makes the life for the average human better in terms of material well being, but also political freedom, that is a good thing. Whenever they make those things worse then it is bad.

A huge reason the US is the country doing so many bad things, is that nearly nobody else can. Any large scale war between two countries in recent times had the US being the agressor or the US intervening massivly. Iraq was done after invading Kuwait and Russia despute having nukes and a resilient economy is not liking it either.

So we have to look at what countries choose to do with the power they have and the US is not the worst in that metric.

 

Translation:

Germany will be able to erect more wind turbines in the North and Baltic Seas over the next ten years than originally planned. Instead of the legally stipulated 40 gigawatts of capacity, areas for 50 gigawatts will be available by 2035, as the Ministry of Economic Affairs announced on Friday. The Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) has identified these areas in its new area development plan. By 2037, there will be space for 60 gigawatts.

"The draft of the area development plan shows that offshore wind energy is also a key pillar in the transformation of the energy system in the long term," said Minister of Economic Affairs Robert Habeck (Greens). According to the plan, there is even space for 60 gigawatts by 2037. Around more than half of these are so-called acceleration areas. These are particularly favourable locations for construction, the wind turbines have a comparatively low environmental impact and can be erected with faster approval procedures.

The 60 gigawatts would bring us close to Germany's long-term target of 70 gigawatts, which is to be achieved by 2045. By then, Germany wants to produce no more CO2 at all, which requires corresponding energy capacities from renewables.

810
Libertarians be like (eupolicy.social)
submitted 4 months ago by MrMakabar to c/memes
 

Headline: Libertarians be like Picture of disugested women next to "Tyranny.gov" Picture of intressted women next to "Tyranny.com"

 
16
submitted 4 months ago by MrMakabar to c/climate
 

Translation from German:

Energy consumption in Germany fell sharply in the first three months of the current year compared to the same period last year. With the exception of the continuously growing population and this year's leap day on 29 February, all influencing factors had the effect of reducing consumption. This applies to the overall subdued macroeconomic development, the mild weather conditions and the high level of energy prices, including the increased costs for CO₂ emissions as part of the national emissions trading scheme for fossil fuels.

According to preliminary calculations by the Working Group on Energy Balances (AG Energiebilanzen), domestic primary energy consumption reached 3,030 petajoules (PJ) or 103.4 million tonnes of coal equivalent (mtce) in the first quarter of 2024. This was 4.6 per cent less than in the same quarter of the previous year.

The consumption of mineral oil fell by 2.8 per cent in the first three months of the current year. While the consumption of petrol fell by around 4.4 per cent and diesel fuel even declined by almost 9 per cent, sales of aviation fuel increased by almost 11 per cent. The supply of crude petrol to the chemical industry fell by more than 4 per cent. By contrast, sales of light heating oil rose by just over 4 per cent as many consumers increased their stocks.

Natural gas consumption recorded a slight increase of 1.2 per cent in the first quarter of the current year, which is largely due to increased consumption as a result of this year's leap day. More natural gas was used in electricity generation in particular. In contrast, the mild weather caused demand for natural gas for heating purposes to fall. In industry, the use of natural gas declined against the backdrop of the production trend. In contrast, there was a slightly positive trend in the trade, commerce and services sector and in district heating generation.

Hard coal consumption fell by more than 20 per cent overall in the first three months. The use of hard coal in power plants to generate electricity fell by more than 40% as a result of an overall decline in electricity generation, increased electricity production from renewable energies and higher electricity purchases from neighbouring countries. Sales to the iron and steel industry increased by just under 4 per cent due to the rise in pig iron production.

Lignite consumption fell by almost a fifth. The decline in production (minus 17.3 per cent) largely corresponded to the development of deliveries to the public utility power plants, which purchase more than 90 per cent of domestic lignite production. Electricity generation from lignite fell by 18.5 per cent in the first quarter of the current year.

The final decommissioning of the last three nuclear power plant units (Neckarwestheim 2, Emsland and Isar 2) on 15 April 2023 means that nuclear energy will no longer contribute to the domestic energy supply.

In the first quarter of 2024, 0.5 billion kWh (1.6 PJ) more electricity was exported abroad than flowed back to Germany. In the same period of the previous year, the export surplus was 9.5 billion kWh (34.3 PJ). So far this year, more electricity has been purchased from France and Belgium than has been supplied. In addition, the export surpluses with Switzerland and Austria have decreased significantly.

The contribution of renewable energies in the first quarter of 2024 was 2.9 per cent higher overall than in the same period of the previous year. This development is due in particular to an increase in electricity production from hydropower, photovoltaics and, above all, wind energy. The use of renewable energies in heat generation declined due to weather conditions.

The clearly recognisable changes in the structure of energy consumption, in particular the further decline in the use of coal, are likely to have led to a reduction in CO₂ emissions of around 6.6% or 12 million tonnes (mt), according to estimates by AG Energiebilanzen. Decline in energy consumption primarily affects coal Development of primary energy consumption 1st quarter 2024 Changes in per cent - Total 3,030 PJ or 103.4 million tce

15
submitted 4 months ago by MrMakabar to c/degrowth
view more: ‹ prev next ›