Mopswasser

joined 1 year ago
[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de -2 points 1 year ago

Aha. Du bist ja mal scharfsinnig, alle Achtung.

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hä? Du hast doch auch ne Meinung und darfst dir unabhängig irgendwelcher Gremien äußern?!

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Haha schön in die Man-Cave zurückziehen, paar Bierchen zischen. Nicht dein Problem 🤣🤣👌👌

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Den „Digital Services Act“ feiern und glauben, dass damit Bürgerrechte im Netz gestärkt werden. Genau nein Humor.

It’s for the greater good.

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

The accounts you shared did not contain any evidence, sadly.

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How could I possibly accept this premise without having seen a shred of tangible evidence? That would be delusional.

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Welp, still no source backing your initial claim that the ban was due to women’s matches outperforming men spectator-wise.

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Still not a shred of evidence that the FA banned women’s football due to jealousy. Good on that fan-site for keeping their memory alive but they don’t even cite sources so …

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

What have I been making up? Perhaps read your own sources more critically.

It’s an illusion that the ban was motivated by jealousy. The only piece of evidence the article supplies is this:

“When I spoke to Alice Norris [one of the Dick, Kerr players of the time] and some of the other ladies they all said they thought the FA was just jealous because they were getting bigger crowds,”

Oral accounts of subjective judgments of affected players.

If there is better evidence, it’s not in the article. Feel free to provide it.

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

That logic is so laughable on its face. A couple charity matches drew a sizeable audience and raised money, so the butthurt FA decided to ban women games from being played on FA affiliated grounds …

Aside from this fantastic 53,000 people number only appearing in a player’s diary, the author couldn’t provide any evidence that the ban was due to the attention womens’ games were getting. Because there is no such evidence.

Of course, women’s football might possibly be bigger today if not for the bans, but going forth with unsubstantiated articles like that certainly doesn’t help.

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

… und ein Haftungsdesaster wenn was schiefgeht.

[–] Mopswasser@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Die leihen sich ihr Geld mehr oder weniger am gleichen Markt. Dass „ein paar Prozente“ richtig viel Geld sind wissen wir aid Konsumentensicht doch zu genüge.

view more: ‹ prev next ›