What did you say?
What do you mean?
I see your point but when basic human rights of a minority group are threatened, there is a moral imperative to organize to protect them, regardless of their popularity. There’s really no way around it. I think a framing that includes trans rights as only one aspect of a larger struggle for human freedom and dignity is the best strategy. Because there will need to be some discussion of trans rights if fascists continue to attack them. The alternative is to abandon a part of our community to violent oppression, which to me is unthinkable.
This is a good article but I feel the headline is a bit misleading. Very few cities have actually adopted the 3-30-300 standard as a goal. Getting them to explicitly endorse it is the first step. I have suggested this in my city but no one had heard of it yet.
Unfortunately, here in the US, cities always seem to only copy one another rather than reach for the best practices across the world. We see this very obviously with street design but it’s also true with green infrastructure like trees.
Describing tankies as further left than other leftists speaks to a poor definition or understanding of the left-right spectrum. There’s no way that apologia for brutal authoritarian dictatorships should be considered a left-wing idea.
Pretty sure BC, VA, and CO are not going along with that.
Aren’t they all scams?
It’s not even foreigners necessarily. There are millions of people who were born in the US that speak a non-English language as their primary language. In fact many of these communities have been here longer than English speakers have been, including native people and the Spanish-speaking inhabitants of territory the US annexed from Mexico, which includes the entire southwest region.
Great video. Even many people on the left don’t seem to understand how artificial and harmful the concept of nationalism is. The world started to make a lot more sense once I understood this issue better.
But I did read it lol