LeylaaLovee

joined 1 year ago

Great breakdown on why even if Vaush wasn't a piece of shit (he is) his debate format is inherently problematic. Ben Shapiro can win debates, I used to copy his style when I was in debate class. Not completely, but definitely used the speaking at a weirdly fast pace to make it hard to follow

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Can you actually define tenderqueer or is that just some signifier like woke and sjw? These are terms that have very little real meaning and just get thrown around to dismiss people for being loud. Vaush has said many transphobic things over the years and always just doubles down afterwards instead of actually listening to trans people. It would be different if he didn't have tweets about how his trans friends get too mad over being misgendered over text, but he does. If that's all that is required for vaush to consider you a tenderqueer, then its a signifier for queer people vaush doesn't like to dismiss their feelings while claiming to be an ally of trans people. It's the same type of toxic ranting right wingers do on trans people and SJWs, except they don't lie about it.

Look, I've already been through my debate bro phase, I was even in debate in high school during it. Going into the conversation with the goal to be right isn't constructive, especially when you don't have any specific advocacies besides for just your beliefs. Dunks/owns are performative more than anything, they're a display of superiority over the stupid opponent. It doesn't advance anybody's thinking, it is inherently stagnant because both people have advocacies to defend and will not give them up. This works well with strong original thinkers like Zizek and Peterson (don't like Peterson, not saying his thoughts are any good but he's definitely a thinker) but a debate is only as valuable as the actual thinkers themselves. Vaush doesn't really change his worldview unless he's just reacting to the world around him, he isn't a right winger, but he is a reactionary. Vaush might shift people a little to the left and that's kinda cool, but he doesn't challenge them to actually think about their beliefs. It's just giving them a more palatable set of paint.

Vaush is not a voice for trans rhetoric. Even if he wasn't talking about trans people in this clip, calling people subhuman is inherently problematic Dehumanization is the base of bigotry..

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hadn't heard of the site until I saw this headline, it just made me laugh

I call him out as a sex pest in other comments.

Also, CIA intervention has pretty much never made anything better. Afghanistan was actually doing pretty well before the CIA militarized them against the communists.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

https://hexbear.net/comment/1447833

Watch the stream clips. I even have one posted on my profile. He has no place here. He simps for the CIA, he isn't a leftist.

I will wait I will wait for you (to vote for Brexit)

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Vaush is a dip shit reactionary debate streamer who gets called a leftist because he uses the aesthetic of anarchism. Simps for the CIA, says he's "building a new left without mentally ill crybabies" and says he means gay and trans people.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Tired of hearing people on here talk about this guy, could have posted a million different things about him being shit. He is a piece of shit and doubles on on this take many times in later streams.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fire, thank you for using NIV, I learned on King James and find that using King James quotes over NIV lead to so much extra confusion like it isn't a translation from the 1600s.

I'm not Christian anymore, but the modern bible never "disowns" the old testament. Maybe there were books written around Jesus' time that got eradicated with the gnostics. There was a real debate over whether or not Jesus was a rebirth of God or just a manifestation of God though. I mean OT God is kind of a bastard, dude literally drowned almost every living thing on the planet, would tell parents to get on the verge of killing their children as "faith tests". In comparison, NT God and Jesus are far more loving than pretty much anything we see in the OT.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Doesn't know shit about theory or what he actually means by socialism, and has all this in his history. Vaush is a reactionary sex pest that deserves no quarter in this community.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

"Don't talk in riddles"

"Churlish"

God you're so far up your own ass defending some reactionary streamer that is literally just Sargon of Akkad for libs. Manage to type 3 sentences that say nothing. Vaush has a toxic ass fanbase that he sicks on people. When Chapo fans do that shit, we defederate their instance. But when a racist white sex pest lib does it, we have people defending him. What a joke. Those are two links btw

view more: ‹ prev next ›