JGrffn

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] JGrffn@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bad moment to say anything positive about LTT, even if it's true๐Ÿ˜‚

[โ€“] JGrffn@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do think the Naomi Wu thing was mostly a misunderstanding taken to extremes due to fanbases toxicity (doubt she would've outright said Linus wanted her to suck his dick if the stans hadn't started harassing her, she basically jumped to all out offensiveness out of spite). This, however? Even if she was also being toxic in the workplace, it just means management had been so horrible that toxic behaviors developed with ease and would just spin out of control. This all sounds like they could just not adapt to becoming more corporate oriented fast enough, and the fact that Linus just recently stepped down as CEO is clear proof of this. He should've done that years ago.

[โ€“] JGrffn@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I think they should take a moment to figure out how to proceed regarding Madison, because I my opinion, her allegations are of nuclear proportions when compared to the recent events.

[โ€“] JGrffn@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think a more appropriate approach is just to mention lemmy to your circles of friends and try to get any redditors you personally know to give lemmy a try, at least get the app installed so they can browse both reddit and lemmy. Lemmy won't be able to handle millions upon millions of new people, especially ones with no guidance, but communities aren't built overnight and we should do our best to get those who could use lemmy to use lemmy, one at a time. We shouldn't be trying to overthrow reddit, just give a viable alternative to those willing to try one. It's the more organic approach.

[โ€“] JGrffn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And that's exactly the problem, it's by design to pull you into a proprietary ecosystem and squeeze you for your money. Since companies have more incentive to make things NOT work across platforms than they do to work together, we're not getting out of this mess without government regulations in the countries that matter (so, USA and Europe.... Mostly Europe...)

Case in point: Apple and USB C, or phones and removable batteries.

[โ€“] JGrffn@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I hate how everything requires additional software all the time (at least on Windows). Just give me proper drivers and no bloat, how hard could that be? Instead I need the G HUB for button mapping on my G903, I need Logi Options for the fn keys to work on my MX Keys, I need two of Corsair's shitty fucking apps just to get readings from my "smart" PSU and to control the fans on my AIO, I needed an additional ASUS program that was incredibly fucking shitty, just to control the case fans (eventually gave up and now I'm more than happy just going into the BIOS settings)....and don't get me started on the rgb. Close G HUB? Now my mouse is all rainbows n shit. Close Corsair whateverthefuckname? Now my corsair keyboard has all the wrong colors since somehow they don't map them correctly to the onboard memory (I got rid of that keyboard and got the Mx Keys instead because there was 0 upsides to having a mechanical rgb keyboard). Even on my razer laptop, if I dare not have synapse, I'm stuck with shitty rgb mode, and they don't even try to get white properly implemented into their RGB keyboards.

Companies have had the chance to work together on making these things more standardized, less bloated, more controllable and user friendly, but instead they choose the path of bloated and buggy software or web apps for things you should be able to do locally. I hate it and I'm never going RGB or fancy schmancy that requires custom software ever again.

[โ€“] JGrffn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right, but we all live under capitalism and have bills to pay. It's true that youtubers quite generally rely on sponsored ads to make probably most of their profit, but YouTube ad revenue still is a decent chunk of it. And that's not even getting into hosting an instance.

The only real way peertube works is if it implements some sort of subscription system (I think instance-wide subscriptions following the nebula pattern would be ideal). It's easier for text-based platforms to stay afloat with random small donations from less than 1% of users since the storage requirements aren't as egregious, but we do need to remember that even YouTube operated at a loss last I heard. It was only kept afloat by Google. Hell, even image hosting sites get the short end of the stick sometimes (still mourning gfycat), I can't imagine a free video hosting platform staying afloat at all, let alone pull serious content creators to it.

I'm not too confident in peertube ever going big, if I'm honest. I'm not confident in monolithic gif/image sites either, but that's a lot easier to self-host than a giant library of random videos that could far outgrow your system if you aren't careful. You wouldn't expect a federated free Netflix to work, would you? And yet that's a fraction of the amount of content a successful PeerTube instance could end up with if it goes anywhere near as viral as a lemmy instance. Hell, even if channels ended up hosting an instance each and not letting anyone else upload to their instance, there's some channels/companies that put out multiple videos a day every single day. No way to keep that afloat long term without a strong revenue system. Like it or not, money is always going to be an issue, especially for peertube.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ