InquisitiveApathy

joined 1 year ago
[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 21 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I see your comments all the time and I just want to say, thank you.

I don't have the energy or care enough to put forth the effort to try to explain these things to the brick wall that is the standard Liberal viewpoint around here. I'm just glad someone is though.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been asking myself the exact same thing.

The top level comment on this thread, to which you complained about graphical syntax, is discussing the MAU decline over the past 30 days.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If you start at zero, the exact same data is shown as when there is a clearly labeled breakpoint. It contributes nothing other than obscuring the data points and scope of discussion is only for the past month. You're not making a cogent point.

Just like I said before, a 5% decline is not an insignificant drop or "very slightly declined." Expanding the scope of the argument to show that it's actually a far steeper decline in user engagement and then arguing the opposite point is misinterpreting the data. Expanding the scope just shows that the trends are continuously showing declining user engagement with no organic growth other than Reddit fucking up.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Showing the data over an entirely different timescale than what's currently under discussion means nothing in this context to illustrate your point.

Starting from 0 on the y axis just means you need to change the scale, which like I said makes reading any data points incomprehensible, or end up with an unnecessary amount of whitespace.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago (7 children)

All starting at 0 would do is ensure that you have no way to accurately gauge the data points values. It would also just compress the data to an incomprehensible smudge of a line.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago (9 children)

The starting point is just so you can adequately see trends for both plots shown and is quite sane. I also don't know if I could call an ~5% decline and clear trend minimal either.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 52 points 1 month ago

Exactly. There isn't anything about this that is actually news or noteworthy. A low enrollment club with the goal of making waves isn't being endorsed by a faculty member that doesn't want to deal with the headache for a club that's going to die again in two years.

This is just normal University administration and operation and yet here we are reading an article about it from a major news outlet.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You don't need to have a perfect body; lighting, indicating soft power through angles, and imagination are your friends. A lot of the best male nudes are the ones where the dick isn't the focus(or even shown at all).

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

What part of ribbed for her pleasure don't you understand?!

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Ah, thanks for the correction I'll edit the comment. I always think NC for some reason, but both Carolinas are pretty interchangable in my mind.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Huh, that's somehow way worse. I always was under the impression that it was only Myrtle Beach.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

I'll copy my response to the other person who was also confused by the reference:

In America, there's a very popular car windshield decal sticker that people put on that says "Salt Life." It specifically just means someone visited a popular beach vacation spot called Myrtle Beach, SC. The people who put it on tend to being almost exclusively sporty douchebags and suburban moms.

That's about it.

Edit: changed NC to SC

view more: ‹ prev next ›