Gorgritch_umie_killa

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
 

The building materials for the facade of London Court came from the dismantled mine head out in Kookynie?!

Thanks! :) I'm super happy with how it turned out!

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Changes to liquor policies explained

For those interested in the changes being implemented, below is from the website.

What has changed?

The Director Liquor Licensing (DLL) has reviewed the former suite of 54 liquor licensing policies to reduce duplicated or outdated requirements.

A new, consolidated suite of 14 policies has been introduced that make it easier to do business in Western Australia, helping to promote a vibrant local hospitality and tourism industry.

The core requirements of most policies have remained the same, in line with the Liquor Control Act 1988.

The policies are in effect from 29 August 2024.

Key changes:

  • Under 18s can now clear used glasses along with dirty plates as part of the approval for juveniles to be on a licensed premises policy.
  • Applicants can use planning documents such as a development approval or occupancy certificate to support their application.
  • The entertainment condition policy has been updated to set out which licences the entertainment condition is imposed on.
  • Applicable conditions under the extended trading permits (ETPs) policy are less onerous. For example, it is now possible to apply for extra trading hours when a WA-based band is playing rather than only interstate acts; and for extended trading hours to be granted on a Sunday before a gazetted Monday public holiday.
  • The fire safety standards for licensed premises policy remain substantially the same, but are more clearly described.
  • The harm minimisation plan policy documentation has been streamlined so that only 1 document is needed instead of 3. The description of what applicants are asked to provide is clearer and includes some practices that mitigate risk to assist applicants.
  • The lodger’s policy more clearly sets out those requirements, including that a lodger can have 6 adult guests, and licensees can apply for an increase to the number of adult guests when alcohol is being consumed outside of trading hours.
  • The occasional licence policy has been updated, more clearly setting out those requirements.
  • The old public interest assessment policy has been replaced with a simpler form which allows the applicant to more easily explain why the application is in the public interest.
  • The residential premises policy provides updated information on the limited circumstances under which a residence may be a licensed premises.
  • The responsible promotion and advertising of alcohol requirements remain substantially the same, including that promotions must not encourage the rapid or excessive consumption of alcohol.
  • The security licensing conditions policy explains what factors make an event or premises high risk, and under what circumstances the DLL may relax standard security requirements if there are appropriate harm minimisations strategies in place.
  • The special facility licences policy now contains clearer information on the operational requirements of each prescribed type of licence, with outdated restrictions on certain licence types removed.
  • The temporary bars policy remains substantially the same but the licensing arrangements are more clearly described.
  • The old Producer’s licence policy has been removed. Producers are no longer required to have 1.5 hectares of vines or the ability to produce 5000 bottles of wine per year.
 

Obligatory before photo. Two panels up, screwed and glued. All panels up, plus some fill in strips where the wall/my positioning wasn't quite even. Bit of a pastel orange shade, going for a calm warm vibe. Few more bits to sort out, like the curtains, but this is basically it.

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't know, I feel like there was some unnecessary derision there.

I like this place because we have discussions, sometimes weeks long, about the subjects, not the users.

Good ideas in this article.

We need to change our practices after the experience of last summer alone, The Big Dry, Joe Fontaine, et al , contijuing what we're doing can only increase more risk for forrest and homes, or environmental collapses followed by increased agricultural hardship.

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Missed the next two lines,

Less bike lanes

Free parking

Induced demand

More traffic

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You guys turn up to vote in Local Gov elections? I think most of ours are postal. I wonder if that means NSW turnout is better?

We like to believe our societies are a calm, rational place of logical decision makers.

We're actually a rowdy bunch of anachronistic apes, with a chronic case of the hypocrititis.

So Brett Worthington in his weekly politics wrap up has indicated a well put case for the phase out of live sheep export is available on Sussan Ley's website. Yes the same Sussan Ley who is now supporting the farmers in the 'keep the sheep' campaign.

Warning If 'abbatoir' language is too much, this link might be worth a skip for ya.

https://sussanley.com/issue-ending-live-sheep-exports-can-confusing/

Here it is on webarchive. Just in case Ley's office decide their website needs a midnight declutter.

Na, she's already a cross-bencher. Another ~4 years on her term. She'd have to do something pretty drastic to even get censured.

And when you've got kooky ol'Malcolm Roberts next to her sounding like he's about as high as the ISS everytime he stands to speak, i think Payman will be fine.

 

The plans for two hotels is noticeably absent from this article.

 

The impact on the inhabitants of these forests is conspicuous in its absence from this article, but i guess they have some allies in the trail users.

6
URL question. (aussie.zone)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone to c/meta@aussie.zone
 

My web dunce question of the week is,

Why would the images url be linked to aussie.zone when the community is blahaj.zone and the poster is lemm.ee?

Is it as simple as the lemm.ee poster might have seen it on aussie.zone and cross posted, or copied over from there?

Edit,

So, just checked this post on the sync app, (using Jerboa for the post), and sync has recognised the image as a URL? I'm confused, i loaded it in Jerboa like i'd normally load a screenshot as an image. Anyway, sorry if the picture doesn't display.

I'm just trying to understand the lemmy system a little better, not trying to highlight a perceived problem.

 

Just stalking the 'about' side bar over on c/melbourne, as any Western Australian on a Saturday night is of course doing... we have lives over here!.. I think... , and noticed they adopted a Numbat at Perth Zoo!

How freakin cool! Cheers guys! But, why in Perth and not Melbourne?

 

Okay, if theres a 15 year old on the teacup ride then i don't think i'll feel safe. I need to see that 'pack a day' guy behind the controls or i just won't feel reassured. /j

 

Interesting, i just assumed Albany being such a large regional centre already had extended trading hours.

view more: next ›