overview for GenericUsername

Spüren auch Sie das einzigartige Gefühle des Mercedes C 220 auf Ihrer Haut! Der Mercedes C 220 ist mehr als ein Auto - es ist ein Lebensgefühl, das Ihnen den Atem raubt! Der Mercedes C 220 haut auch Sie garantiert vom Hocker!

Schock in Dresden-Weißig: Mercedesfahrerin erfasst Fahrradfahrerin – stirbt im Krankenwagen in c/fahrrad@feddit.de

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wichtig zu erwähnen, dass die gute Frau Mercedes fuhr. Soll ja keiner denken man gehöre zum einfachen Pöbel, der es sich nur leisten kann im schäbigen Golf Menschen umzunieten.

Schock in Dresden-Weißig: Mercedesfahrerin erfasst Fahrradfahrerin – stirbt im Krankenwagen in c/fahrrad@feddit.de

Took a peek on Reddit, it really boggles my mind how oblivious and obedient people are. in c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Over 800 million monthly users, really? :D

ich_iel in c/ich_iel@feddit.de

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Hab dich ganz doll lieb für immer und ewig bis dass der Tod uns scheidet

ich_iel in c/ich_iel@feddit.de

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Auf der Mauer

Auf der Lauer

Sitzt 'ne kleine Maus

Reddit just auto removed my comment with a link to Lemmy.ml in c/technology@beehaw.org

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

URL shorteners are generally blocked and for good reason.

How so? I can get bit.ly being blocked in general as it's commonly known but emol.ink for example is not. For all an unsuspecting reader knows that (emol.ink) could be an alternative to emojipedia.

Can any URL shortener be detected by Automod automatically with technical means, by checking for permanent redirects e.g.?

Or is some poor fella forced to maintain a static list of know URL shorteners the Automod uses? :D

204

ich⭐iel (feddit.de)

submitted 1 year ago by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/ich_iel@feddit.de

8 comments fedilink

1

I rule (feddit.de)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

0 comments fedilink

112

ich🐅iel (feddit.de)

submitted 1 year ago by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/ich_iel@feddit.de

3 comments fedilink

4

Chat Control: The EU's CSEM scanner proposal (www.patrick-breyer.de)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/europe@lemmy.ml

11 comments fedilink

To quote the article's introduction:

The End of the Privacy of Digital Correspondence

The EU Commission proposes to oblige providers to search all private chats, messages, and emails automatically for suspicious content – generally and indiscriminately. The stated aim: To prosecute child sexual exploitation material (CSEM). The result: Mass surveillance by means of fully automated real-time surveillance of messaging and chats and the end of privacy of digital correspondence.

Other aspects of the proposal include ineffective network blocking, screening of personal cloud storage including private photos, mandatory age verification resulting in the end of anonymous communication, appstore censorship and excluding minors from the digital world.

Post edited 2023-06-14 to insert the quote. I did not notice the auto-generated body before.

2

rule (feddit.de)

submitted 1 year ago by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/196@lemmy.world

0 comments fedilink