Wait wait wait... immutable means unchangeable! In your analogy this would mean if someone changes anything about them, like a name due to marriage or gender due to affirming care, they become a new object. And you can, but shouldn't assign that new object the same UUID.
FleetingTit
joined 2 months ago
What is broken about copper? Bit ootl.
Religion is such a great thing [...] you almost say [...] let's not be good what difference does it make
It's about options, buddy! Having a headphone jack does not prevent you from using Bluetooth headphones.
You won't get away from that with MD3
The victims come in all shapes, sizes, and colours though.
Mehr Taucher als Frauen hier, verrückt!
Kaum jemand hält dieses Acht-Stunden-Dogma in seinem Arbeitstag noch durch.
Korrekt, ich bin nach 8 Stunden vollkommen gerädert. Ich hätte gerne weniger, Her Spahn, Herr Köhler.
They might keep driving, but some infotainment features (or even other features that are tied to subscriptions) might stop working.
Depending on the implementation of these features that could mean the car constantly shows error messages, or the infotainment freezes, or in the worst case the car won't even start or charge.
Some of these concerns are true for newer cars of traditional manufacturers: what happens when their online services become unavailable?
Women are confidential or privileged information in [the area].
Look at the panel in the lower right corner.
view more: next ›
I would just argue that objects of the Person-type are mutable, because basically everything about them can change without modifying who they are. The only thing immutable about a person is any one Moment-type object in their past.
Edit: I found your comment to be an interesting take on the concept, thank you!