BigNote

joined 1 year ago
[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I work in industrial construction on massive unionized projects with tradespeople coming from all over the US and Canada and I can tell you for an objective fact that the number of guys --it's almost always guys, which should tell you something-- who drive giant lifted obnoxious trucks as their daily driver vs the number who actually really and truly need them on a regular basis is like 100 to 1.

But even if it were only 10 to 1, that means we have 10 times as many of these giant gas guzzling dangerous trucks out on the road.

The industry has done such a good job at selling these trucks as part of a self-image, that a lot of guys are incapable of admitting that the only reason they drive one is because they think it looks cool.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I can easily do all of that and more with my non-lifted mid-sized long-bed pickup. It's just a fact my dude; they are selling a self-image, not actual utility. Or what about a van with a roof-rack. In my professional experience that's a lot more utilitarian if you're a tradesman.

Again, it's all about an image that's been meticulously and brilliantly marketed and sold to very specific demographics.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

To be fair, they are hugely popular in both Canada and Mexico as well. I'll leave it to you to figure out why.

Hint; if marketing didn't work, it wouldn't be a multi-billion dollar industry.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that's a Federal violation, so not the same thing at all.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not true at all. There's tons of adaptive pressure. If there weren't, we wouldn't see the thousands of pelagic and shorebird species that we do. But even if what you say about the threat from predation were true --its not-- there would still be adaptive pressure from differential reproduction rates and access to nutrients.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They're probably just "dumb" in comparison to corvids and parrots and the like.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Well obviously it's very difficult for the poor to leave and if you aren't poor it's actually a pretty nice place to live.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Also most of the loyalists in the colonies fled to Canada during and immediately after the American Revolution, for obvious reasons.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. I entirely understand that some people don't have that option, but it's worth reiterating that if you have a choice, you're best off not to have partitions at all.

I run Mint on an 8-year-old Mac desktop machine with no partitions and it's lightning-fast for everything I need it to do.

It's also worth mentioning that I have said desktop machine because my wife is a pro photographer and Apple and Adobe have colluded for decades to create a kind of "planned obsolescence" whereby professional photographers are ostensibly locked out of the current industry standard unless they run a very recent version of Photoshop that by design isn't compatible with hardware architecture that's more than about 5-years-old.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

None. My wife doesn't know about tact, or the polite white lie or anything like that. She doesn't have time for that bullshit. It's one of her endearing qualities.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And it was obvious that they'd already decided to invade Iraq long before Powell's infamous UN presentation.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

What a crock of shit!

Why would capital willingly poison its workforce as a deliberate policy? That makes zero sense.

I can see capital writing it off as a necessary side-cost of doing business, but I can't see it as a deliberate policy.

Again, it makes no sense. Capital wants a relatively healthy workforce, not one that's falling apart due to lead-caused neurological decrepitude.

view more: ‹ prev next ›